Prev: On Ultrafinitism
Next: Modal logic example
From: Lester Zick on 21 Mar 2007 19:02
On 20 Mar 2007 21:06:33 -0700, "Brian Chandler"
<imaginatorium(a)despammed.com> wrote:

>> I'm a physicist, Randy, not a psychologist.
>
>Gosh, honto? Only the other day you were a mathematician, you said.

Still am.

~v~~
From: Lester Zick on 21 Mar 2007 19:02
On 20 Mar 2007 21:11:30 -0700, "Brian Chandler"
<imaginatorium(a)despammed.com> wrote:

>On the contrary, I think he has explained practically all of them, to
>his own satisfaction,

And which aren't explained to your own satisfaction, Brian?

~v~~
From: Lester Zick on 21 Mar 2007 19:04
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 22:59:55 -0600, Virgil <virgil(a)comcast.net> wrote:

>But that was a thursday!

No doubt it was somewhere.

~v~~
From: Lester Zick on 21 Mar 2007 19:26
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 14:17:16 -0500, Tony Orlow <tony(a)lightlink.com>
wrote:

>It states the specific infinite number of points in the unit interval,
>say, on the real line.

And what real line would that be, Tony?

~v~~
From: Lester Zick on 21 Mar 2007 19:28
On 21 Mar 2007 12:32:13 -0700, "Mike Kelly"
<mikekellyuk(a)googlemail.com> wrote:

>Don't waste time responding to me. I have no interest in conversing
>with trolls, no matter how clever or amusing they think themselves.

Of course you don't per say which is why I don't per say.

~v~~
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92
Prev: On Ultrafinitism
Next: Modal logic example