The Doppler effect and its meaning about photon energy emission !!
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Solving a Math Problem.
Next: Negative Energy
From: Y.Porat on 5 Apr 2010 03:55 As for me the Doppler effect is an immediate disprove of the E=hf as the definition is a single smallest photon energy !! (ps this issue is only for cleaver honest creative people ie not for crooked parrots ..or just crooks ...) TIA Y.Porat --------------------
From: Inertial on 5 Apr 2010 03:58 "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:6575e595-0ee0-49e8-ae9f-448c0a4c0708(a)e7g2000yqf.googlegroups.com... > As for me > > the Doppler effect > is an immediate disprove of the > E=hf Except it doesn't. Frequency (and energy) is frame dependent > as the definition is a single smallest photon energy !! Which it refutes .. if you are claiming that photons are made up of smaller photons with a fixed frequencies and energy. Is that what you claim .. the a photon of light (say) is made up of smaller energy photons, of fixed frequency and energy? > (ps > this issue is only for cleaver honest > creative people > ie not for crooked parrots ..or just crooks ...) So why are you posting it .. you ARE a crook.
From: Y.Porat on 5 Apr 2010 04:28 On Apr 5, 9:58 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > news:6575e595-0ee0-49e8-ae9f-448c0a4c0708(a)e7g2000yqf.googlegroups.com... > > > As for me > > > the Doppler effect > > is an immediate disprove of the > > E=hf > > Except it doesn't. Frequency (and energy) is frame dependent > > > as the definition is a single smallest photon energy !! > > Which it refutes .. if you are claiming that photons are made up of smaller > photons with a fixed frequencies and energy. > > Is that what you claim .. the a photon of light (say) is made up of smaller > energy photons, of fixed frequency and energy? > > > (ps > > this issue is only for cleaver honest > > creative people > > ie not for crooked parrots ..or just crooks ...) > > So why are you posting it .. you ARE a crook. ---------------------- (:-) and that anonymous psychopath imbecile Inertial = ARTFUL == ??? is the example to creatures whom i am not going to discuss with !! 2 since i don t believe in spoon feeding can anyone of the other readers guess why i claim the above ?? TIA Y.Porat ---------------------
From: Inertial on 5 Apr 2010 04:54 "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:6ca1ebc7-4cb6-4ad0-b4d2-6882d7467442(a)r1g2000yqj.googlegroups.com... > On Apr 5, 9:58 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: >> "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >> >> news:6575e595-0ee0-49e8-ae9f-448c0a4c0708(a)e7g2000yqf.googlegroups.com... >> >> > As for me >> >> > the Doppler effect >> > is an immediate disprove of the >> > E=hf >> >> Except it doesn't. Frequency (and energy) is frame dependent >> >> > as the definition is a single smallest photon energy !! >> >> Which it refutes .. if you are claiming that photons are made up of >> smaller >> photons with a fixed frequencies and energy. >> >> Is that what you claim .. the a photon of light (say) is made up of >> smaller >> energy photons, of fixed frequency and energy? >> >> > (ps >> > this issue is only for cleaver honest >> > creative people >> > ie not for crooked parrots ..or just crooks ...) >> >> So why are you posting it .. you ARE a crook. > > ---------------------- > (:-) > and that anonymous psychopath imbecile > Inertial = ARTFUL == ??? > is the example to creatures whom That's you > i am not going to discuss with !! Scared eh? I have shown you wrong too many times. > 2 > since i don t believe in spoon feeding > can anyone > of the other readers guess > why i claim the above ?? What above?
From: Y.Porat on 5 Apr 2010 05:42
On Apr 5, 10:54 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > news:6ca1ebc7-4cb6-4ad0-b4d2-6882d7467442(a)r1g2000yqj.googlegroups.com... > > > > > On Apr 5, 9:58 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > >> "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > >>news:6575e595-0ee0-49e8-ae9f-448c0a4c0708(a)e7g2000yqf.googlegroups.com.... > > >> > As for me > > >> > the Doppler effect > >> > is an immediate disprove of the > >> > E=hf > > >> Except it doesn't. Frequency (and energy) is frame dependent > > >> > as the definition is a single smallest photon energy !! > > >> Which it refutes .. if you are claiming that photons are made up of > >> smaller > >> photons with a fixed frequencies and energy. > > >> Is that what you claim .. the a photon of light (say) is made up of > >> smaller > >> energy photons, of fixed frequency and energy? > > >> > (ps > >> > this issue is only for cleaver honest > >> > creative people > >> > ie not for crooked parrots ..or just crooks ...) > > >> So why are you posting it .. you ARE a crook. > > > ---------------------- > > (:-) > > and that anonymous psychopath imbecile > > Inertial = ARTFUL == ??? > > is the example to creatures whom > > That's you > > > i am not going to discuss with !! > > Scared eh? I have shown you wrong too many times. > > > 2 > > since i don t believe in spoon feeding > > can anyone > > of the other readers guess > > why i claim the above ?? > > What above? ------------------------ i thought i wrote English **i am not going to discuss with """"Inertial** is it not clear enough??!! next Y.P ------------------- |