The Emission Theory of Androcles
in [Relativity]
|
From: Jonah Thomas on 9 Sep 2009 15:44 "Androcles" <Headmaster(a)Hogwarts.physics_n> wrote: > "Jonah Thomas" <jethomas5(a)gmail.com> wrote > > Jerry <Cephalobus_alienus(a)comcast.net> wrote: > >> How can you take Androcles and Wilson at all seriously? > > > > They have an interesting idea, one that is mostly rejected. > > > > Sorry to be so incoherent myself. > > How can you take known trolls such as Tom&Jeery seriously? I guess I just tend to take people seriously. It's all people trying to do the best they can with their lives. And if I stopped paying attention to everybody that people on spr warn me about, who would I have left here?
From: Henry Wilson, DSc on 9 Sep 2009 18:20 On Wed, 9 Sep 2009 08:29:57 +0100, "Androcles" <Headmaster(a)Hogwarts.physics_n> wrote: > >"Henry Wilson, DSc" <hw@..> wrote in message >news:um8ea597kf8vasq0t7v2uho6ur14nvuf31(a)4ax.com... >> On Wed, 9 Sep 2009 01:11:00 +0100, "Androcles" >> My method uses the maximum orbit speed. It gets that from the observed >> value >> WHICH IS THE REAL ONE x COS PITCH. > >You are not worth arguing with. >observed value = orbital value * cos(pitch) as you say, so > >Real world: >orbital value = observed value / cos(pitch) >Wilson's world: >orbital value = observed value / magic unifuckation >End of fuckin' story, you are crazy. Ah, I now see your grounds for complaint. Why didn't you explain this before. I have previously stated the answer to this problem. When light changes speed, each photon's intrinsic absolute wavelength also changes accordingly. For instance, if a photon decelerates, its wavecrests move closer together, so their flow rate remains the same....like cars on a highway in different speed zones. Therefore, after unification, the arrival frequency of wavecrests is still a true indication of relative source velocity. That usually includes cos (pitch) because there is no easy way to determine the actual pitch angle of a point source. I see a photon as something like a coiled spring with no elastic properties. It expands or shrinks with a speed change. Its intrinsic ABSOLUTE wavelength is the distance between coils. (the 'spring' is possibly a standing wave running the length of the 'quantum') Henry Wilson...www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm Einstein...World's greatest SciFi writer..
From: Henry Wilson, DSc on 9 Sep 2009 18:35 On Wed, 9 Sep 2009 01:26:09 -0700 (PDT), Jerry <Cephalobus_alienus(a)comcast.net> wrote: >On Sep 8, 10:13�pm, Jonah Thomas <jethom...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >How can you take Androcles and Wilson at all seriously? When their oponents like you publish one blunder after another, why shouldn't he? >Jerry hahahhahah! Poor old Jerry...never gets anything right. Henry Wilson...www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm Einstein...World's greatest SciFi writer..
From: Androcles on 9 Sep 2009 19:23 "Henry Wilson, DSc" <hw@..> wrote in message news:6p9ga5t7slj9f7ss550i5fnvsf2all9n6r(a)4ax.com... > On Wed, 9 Sep 2009 08:29:57 +0100, "Androcles" > <Headmaster(a)Hogwarts.physics_n> > wrote: > >> >>"Henry Wilson, DSc" <hw@..> wrote in message >>news:um8ea597kf8vasq0t7v2uho6ur14nvuf31(a)4ax.com... >>> On Wed, 9 Sep 2009 01:11:00 +0100, "Androcles" > > >>> My method uses the maximum orbit speed. It gets that from the observed >>> value >>> WHICH IS THE REAL ONE x COS PITCH. >> >>You are not worth arguing with. >>observed value = orbital value * cos(pitch) as you say, so >> >>Real world: >>orbital value = observed value / cos(pitch) >>Wilson's world: >>orbital value = observed value / magic unifuckation >>End of fuckin' story, you are crazy. > > Ah, I now see your grounds for complaint. Why didn't you explain this > before. > > I have previously stated the answer to this problem. > > When light changes speed, Light doesn't change speed. You are fuckin' crazy.
From: Henry Wilson, DSc on 9 Sep 2009 20:47
On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 00:23:01 +0100, "Androcles" <Headmaster(a)Hogwarts.physics_n> wrote: > >"Henry Wilson, DSc" <hw@..> wrote in message >news:6p9ga5t7slj9f7ss550i5fnvsf2all9n6r(a)4ax.com... >> On Wed, 9 Sep 2009 08:29:57 +0100, "Androcles" >> <Headmaster(a)Hogwarts.physics_n> >> wrote: >> >>> >>>"Henry Wilson, DSc" <hw@..> wrote in message >>>news:um8ea597kf8vasq0t7v2uho6ur14nvuf31(a)4ax.com... >>>> On Wed, 9 Sep 2009 01:11:00 +0100, "Androcles" >> >> >>>> My method uses the maximum orbit speed. It gets that from the observed >>>> value >>>> WHICH IS THE REAL ONE x COS PITCH. >>> >>>You are not worth arguing with. >>>observed value = orbital value * cos(pitch) as you say, so >>> >>>Real world: >>>orbital value = observed value / cos(pitch) >>>Wilson's world: >>>orbital value = observed value / magic unifuckation >>>End of fuckin' story, you are crazy. >> >> Ah, I now see your grounds for complaint. Why didn't you explain this >> before. >> >> I have previously stated the answer to this problem. >> >> When light changes speed, > >Light doesn't change speed. You are fuckin' crazy. What happens when it enters glass? Henry Wilson...www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm Einstein...World's greatest SciFi writer.. |