From: Henry Wilson, DSc on
On Sat, 19 Sep 2009 01:00:00 -0700 (PDT), Jerry
<Cephalobus_alienus(a)comcast.net> wrote:

>On Sep 19, 2:50�am, Jonah Thomas <jethom...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> Jerry <Cephalobus_alie...(a)comcast.net> wrote:
>> > Jonah Thomas <jethom...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > Jerry <Cephalobus_alie...(a)comcast.net> wrote:
ersus Ritz.
>>
>> > The analyses of the mirrored Sagnac apparatus found on this
>> > newsgroup usually follow the Tolman assumptions, and find no
>> > predicted fringe displacement.
>>
>> > It appears that the assumption of Ritzian reflections (which I
>> > find utterly bizarre) does result in a fringe displacement in a
>> > mirrored Sagnac apparatus.
>>
>> I agree that ritzian reflections look bizarre. But are they more bizarre
>> than special relativity?
>
>I find special relativity to be utterly natural.
>
>One way of looking at SR is that it is a direct expression of the
>geometry of Minkowski space-time. If you understand the geometry,
>all concerns about supposed "paradoxes" vanish.

If you understand circular logic, all of Einstein's theory vanishes.

>> > But here is where the "general argument" falls flat on its face.
>> > Before the invention of fibre optics, it was considered
>> > impossible to achieve a closed light path without the use of
>> > mirrors. Fibre optic gyroscopes represent a mirrorless
>> > implementation of the Sagnac principle, and all versions of
>> > emission theories predict zero fringe displacement given a
>> > mirrorless closed loop.
>>
>> Do fiber optics work without reflection>
>
>Correct.
>
>Jerry
>


Henry Wilson...www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm

Einstein...World's greatest SciFi writer..
From: Henry Wilson, DSc on
On Sat, 19 Sep 2009 00:46:41 +0100, "Androcles" <Headmaster(a)Hogwarts.physics_o>
wrote:

>
>"Henry Wilson, DSc" <hw@..> wrote in message
>news:l458b5dpi4f3qk5plr2kqk569bt16sbe3b(a)4ax.com...
Incidentally, on a more serious note, you once produced an animation of two
counter-rotating gear wheels supposedly demonstrating the Sagnac effect. Do you
still have that?

Henry Wilson...www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm

Einstein...World's greatest SciFi writer..
From: Androcles on

"Henry Wilson, DSc" <hw@..> wrote in message
news:jdnab5piaefj8kgsoi99th0tsricss1ri8(a)4ax.com...
> On Sat, 19 Sep 2009 00:46:41 +0100, "Androcles"
> <Headmaster(a)Hogwarts.physics_o>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Henry Wilson, DSc" <hw@..> wrote in message
>>news:l458b5dpi4f3qk5plr2kqk569bt16sbe3b(a)4ax.com...
> Incidentally, on a more serious note, you once produced an animation of
> two
> counter-rotating gear wheels supposedly demonstrating the Sagnac effect.
> Do you
> still have that?

Of course, and you can't count.
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Sagnac/MechSagnac.gif


From: Jerry on
On Sep 19, 12:19 am, Jonah Thomas <jethom...(a)gmail.com> wrote:

> As I have said before, people who believe in relativity have no ground
> to reject theories for not making sense.
>
> I'm interested in experimental refutations, though.

http://mysite.verizon.net/cephalobus_alienus/index.htm

Jerry
From: Henry Wilson, DSc on
On Sun, 20 Sep 2009 00:26:04 +0100, "Androcles" <Headmaster(a)Hogwarts.physics_o>
wrote:

>
>"Henry Wilson, DSc" <hw@..> wrote in message
>news:jdnab5piaefj8kgsoi99th0tsricss1ri8(a)4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 19 Sep 2009 00:46:41 +0100, "Androcles"
>> <Headmaster(a)Hogwarts.physics_o>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"Henry Wilson, DSc" <hw@..> wrote in message
>>>news:l458b5dpi4f3qk5plr2kqk569bt16sbe3b(a)4ax.com...
>> Incidentally, on a more serious note, you once produced an animation of
>> two
>> counter-rotating gear wheels supposedly demonstrating the Sagnac effect.
>> Do you
>> still have that?
>
>Of course, and you can't count.
> http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Sagnac/MechSagnac.gif

that's the one...but I can't use it after all....not enough detail or info



Henry Wilson...www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm

Einstein...World's greatest SciFi writer..