The End of m.p.s.v.
in [Windows Viruses]
|
From: MEB on 29 May 2010 17:45 On 05/29/2010 05:37 PM, Leythos wrote: > In article <eSkgI22$KHA.1700(a)TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl>, MEB-not- > here(a)hotmail.com says... >> But anything IN Usenet/use net/usenet it obtained elsewhere [which it >> does own, control, and otherwise, is NOT its property. So again, a >> useless claim. Microsoft OWNS its groups, the hierarchy, and the >> presentation as so stated BY Microsoft. >> > > MS does not "Own" the groups, and they only control the content ON THEIR > OWN SERVERS. > Nifty, but that is not factual, Microsoft documents and the Law show otherwise. More baseless, worthless, and material lacking merit. -- MEB http://peoplescounsel.org/ref/windows-main.htm Windows Info, Diagnostics, Security, Networking http://peoplescounsel.org The "real world" of Law, Justice, and Government ___---
From: Geoff on 29 May 2010 17:45 On Sat, 29 May 2010 17:37:46 -0400, "David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote: >My main man Geoff :-) Hi David, yes this is great fun, isn't it? Fine entertainment on a Saturday afternoon. More fun than Topo Gigo. :)
From: MEB on 29 May 2010 17:58 On 05/29/2010 05:34 PM, David H. Lipman wrote: > From: "MEB" <MEB-not-here(a)hotmail.com> > > >>> No, not true at all! > >>> Take the Adobe.* hierarchy. Adobe did they same thing to Usenet more thn a year ago. >>> First Adobe made it a unidirectional feed to Usenet. Then in 2009 they cut all ties >>> to >>> Usenet. Yet, the Adobe.* Usenet hierachy lives on. > > > | Not a good argument. > | What Adobe did has no relevance to what Microsoft does and has done, > | which includes the legal notice to close these groups. THAT and > | Microsoft's documents and applicable Law are what control this/these > | issues, and the Law and Microsoft say close the groups Microsoft OWNS. > > No. When Microsoft connected to Usenet and "peered" they have no ownership of the groups. > Usenet at large is public and not privately held. Microsoft never "peered" to anyone. More baseless, worthless, valueless, and complete lacking in fact material. > > Microsoft, on the other hand, owns their Forums. > Microsoft OWN the forums, the groups, the presentation, and all that entails. -- MEB http://peoplescounsel.org/ref/windows-main.htm Windows Info, Diagnostics, Security, Networking http://peoplescounsel.org The "real world" of Law, Justice, and Government ___---
From: David H. Lipman on 29 May 2010 19:00 From: "Geoff" <geoff(a)invalid.invalid> | On Sat, 29 May 2010 17:37:46 -0400, "David H. Lipman" | <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote: >>My main man Geoff :-) | Hi David, yes this is great fun, isn't it? Fine entertainment on a | Saturday afternoon. More fun than Topo Gigo. :) ;-) -- Dave http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp
From: Leythos on 29 May 2010 21:10
In article <u8el4f3$KHA.5168(a)TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl>, MEB-not- here(a)hotmail.com says... > > You're wrong again - there is a very real structure and everything that > > enters it via willing participants, unless owned by someone else, is > > public domain. MS agreed to this when they started pushing their content > > out to Usenet. > > Microsoft never *pushed* its property anywhere. > > Baseless, worthless and merit-less arguments. > And yet you can't provide anything to prove your statement, but, we can easily see that they have and do. -- You can't trust your best friends, your five senses, only the little voice inside you that most civilians don't even hear -- Listen to that. Trust yourself. spam999free(a)rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address) |