From: Mitchell Jones on
In article <G6udnYWAyIoqIa_RnZ2dnUVZ_g-dnZ2d(a)mchsi.com>,
Sam Wormley <swormley1(a)gmail.com> wrote:

> Methane releases in arctic seas could wreak devastation
> Warming climate could lead to dead zones, acidification and shifts at
> the base of the ocean�s food chain.
> http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/60831/title/Methane_releases_in_arc
> tic_seas_could_wreak_devastation

***{Your position is in ruins, yet you continue with the same tired
refrain. You are a waste of skin. --MJ}***

*****************************************************************
If I seem to be ignoring you, consider the possibility
that you are in my killfile. --MJ
From: Sam Wormley on
On 7/6/10 1:03 PM, Mitchell Jones wrote:
> In article<G6udnYWAyIoqIa_RnZ2dnUVZ_g-dnZ2d(a)mchsi.com>,
> Sam Wormley<swormley1(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Methane releases in arctic seas could wreak devastation
>> Warming climate could lead to dead zones, acidification and shifts at
>> the base of the ocean�s food chain.
>> http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/60831/title/Methane_releases_in_arc
>> tic_seas_could_wreak_devastation
>
> ***{Your position is in ruins, yet you continue with the same tired
> refrain. You are a waste of skin. --MJ}***
>
> *****************************************************************
> If I seem to be ignoring you, consider the possibility
> that you are in my killfile. --MJ

Nobody likes to read science articles that conflict with
the way they wish things to be.


From: Puppet_Sock on
On Jul 6, 3:01 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On 7/6/10 1:03 PM, Mitchell Jones wrote:
>
> > In article<G6udnYWAyIoqIa_RnZ2dnUVZ_g-dn...(a)mchsi.com>,
> >   Sam Wormley<sworml...(a)gmail.com>  wrote:
>
> >> Methane releases in arctic seas could wreak devastation
> >> Warming climate could lead to dead zones, acidification and shifts at
> >> the base of the ocean s food chain.
> >>http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/60831/title/Methane_releas....
> >> tic_seas_could_wreak_devastation
>
> > ***{Your position is in ruins, yet you continue with the same tired
> > refrain. You are a waste of skin. --MJ}***
>
> > *****************************************************************
> > If I seem to be ignoring you, consider the possibility
> > that you are in my killfile. --MJ
>
>    Nobody likes to read science articles that conflict with
>    the way they wish things to be.

It would seem that psychological pathology is more likely
to be your problem, considering that you are the one who
is denying the data.
Socks