Prev: It's official! Sony couldn't fix the NEX lens problem.
Next: Photo about Main Square
From: mmyvusenet on 4 Jun 2010 01:43
Hello:

Yesterday I had the opportunity to take this photo, with some activities
around:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4549198813/

Thanks for your technical comments about photography.

--
MMYV
http://www.mmyv.com


From: bugbear on 4 Jun 2010 05:29
mmyvusenet wrote:
> Hello:
>
> Yesterday I had the opportunity to take this photo, with some activities
> around:
>
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4549198813/

Can you please give a little commentary on your photos
instead of just posting them with "Thanks for your technical comments about photography."

If you told us what you're trying to achieve
in terms of colour, shape, texture, composition, lighting or
subject, you might get more useful responses.

Just doing the same damn thing over and over is pointless.

BugBear
From: Mark L on 4 Jun 2010 05:46
On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 10:29:01 +0100, bugbear
<bugbear(a)trim_papermule.co.uk_trim> wrote:

>mmyvusenet wrote:
>> Hello:
>>
>> Yesterday I had the opportunity to take this photo, with some activities
>> around:
>>
>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4549198813/
>
>Can you please give a little commentary on your photos
>instead of just posting them with "Thanks for your technical comments about photography."
>
>If you told us what you're trying to achieve
>in terms of colour, shape, texture, composition, lighting or
>subject, you might get more useful responses.
>
>Just doing the same damn thing over and over is pointless.
>
> BugBear

But it's working, isn't it? How is this any different than what blind
Dudley does?



From: bugbear on 4 Jun 2010 06:15
Mark L wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 10:29:01 +0100, bugbear
> <bugbear(a)trim_papermule.co.uk_trim> wrote:
>
>> mmyvusenet wrote:
>>> Hello:
>>>
>>> Yesterday I had the opportunity to take this photo, with some activities
>>> around:
>>>
>>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4549198813/
>> Can you please give a little commentary on your photos
>> instead of just posting them with "Thanks for your technical comments about photography."
>>
>> If you told us what you're trying to achieve
>> in terms of colour, shape, texture, composition, lighting or
>> subject, you might get more useful responses.
>>
>> Just doing the same damn thing over and over is pointless.
>>
>> BugBear
>
> But it's working, isn't it? How is this any different than what blind
> Dudley does?

For the moment, I'm assuming that mmyvusenet is genuine,
but misguided.

BugBear
From: Martin Brown on 4 Jun 2010 06:32
On 04/06/2010 11:15, bugbear wrote:
> Mark L wrote:
>> On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 10:29:01 +0100, bugbear
>> <bugbear(a)trim_papermule.co.uk_trim> wrote:
>>
>>> mmyvusenet wrote:
>>>> Hello:
>>>>
>>>> Yesterday I had the opportunity to take this photo, with some
>>>> activities around:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4549198813/
>>> Can you please give a little commentary on your photos
>>> instead of just posting them with "Thanks for your technical comments
>>> about photography."
>>>
>>> If you told us what you're trying to achieve
>>> in terms of colour, shape, texture, composition, lighting or
>>> subject, you might get more useful responses.
>>>
>>> Just doing the same damn thing over and over is pointless.
>>>
>>> BugBear
>>
>> But it's working, isn't it? How is this any different than what blind
>> Dudley does?
>
> For the moment, I'm assuming that mmyvusenet is genuine,
> but misguided.
>
> BugBear

This one does seem to be an attempt to get just about every possible
foreground distraction and clutter into a single architectural picture.
The road markings look like they could actually be interesting in an
Abbey Road sort of way.

I had assumed the photos were a front for selling and smuggling parrots.
But I can't see anyone wanting to buy the Lima courthouse.

Regards,
Martin Brown
 |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3
Prev: It's official! Sony couldn't fix the NEX lens problem.
Next: Photo about Main Square