Prev: Photon Detector Paradox
Next: Speed of Light Paradox
From: thejohnlreed on 22 Jul 2010 13:29
The Least Action Consistent Stable Universe and the Mathematics
Modified June 6, 2009, October 13, 2009, March 30, 2010
John Lawrence Reed, Jr.
Section 6

A brief follow up to the author’s June, 2009 post “The Principle of
Equivalence Explained”. See also “The Least Action Consistent Stable
Universe and the Mathematics, Section 5.” Here the issues have been
narrowed down.

First I say, that in the case of pure compounds or elements [F=mg] can
be written as [F=nNmg], where [n] represents the number of moles, [N]
represents Avogadro’s number, and [mg] represents the relative atomic
weight of a single atom of the element.

In as much as the above is correct, then on any planet or moon
surface, [F] can be precisely defined (pretty near) in objective terms
as a “number” of element specific atoms, again, provided we are
weighing pure compounds or elements.

A number of element specific atoms represent an “amount of matter” in
a more objective (and precisely quantitative) manner, than our planet
surface, subjective notion of “resistance”, as [m]. Although in cases
other than pure elements or compounds, the mass of the object alone,
will not provide us a means to calculate the number of atoms in the
object, the principle itself should generalize to all chemical
analysis of samples of planet and moon surface matter.

Second I say:
It follows then that since mass is the quantitative measure of the
conserved, cumulative resistance, of a planet surface, inertial
object's atoms (that we measure and feel), and since we are living
planet surface inertial objects; Then what we measure and feel, and
call gravitational force, is the accelerated, conserved, cumulative
resistance of a planet (or moon) surface, inertial object's atoms.
This includes the atoms that make up our bodies and the atoms in the
bowling ball (etc.) that we lift.

Our notion for a universal force acting on conserved mass is
subjectively functional but nonetheless false. The attraction is on
atoms. Therefore I submit that what we call gravity is a super form of
electro magnetism that acts on all atoms, not just those atoms that
are internally and externally optimally alligned.

Current web address: http://groups.google.com/group/thejohnreed

Endnote
Note that my re-definition of mass in the last paragraph above is
limited to what we can experimentally verify about mass. Namely that
it applies to planet (and moon) surface inertial objects. No
“speculation” whatsoever. I have not used the universal stable system
vehicle of least action, to generalize our subjective feeling of
“force” we call gravity, and assume is the cause of the least action
order we observe in the celestial universe. That assumption is
“speculative”, revered, institutionalized, and heralded as “Newton’s
Great Synthesis”. The description you want as moderator at
Sci.Physics.Research is “blasphemous”, not “too speculative”. johnreed
3/30/10
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Photon Detector Paradox
Next: Speed of Light Paradox