The Lorentz transformation, Minkowski space.
in [Relativity]
|
From: artful on 29 Jan 2010 04:48 On Jan 29, 7:11 pm, socratus <isra...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > The Lorentz transformation, Minkowski space. > ===========. > The Galilean transformation belongs to each inertial frame. Nope > The Galilean transformation fails to preserve Maxwell's equations. Yeup > Why the Galilean transformation useless in the Maxwell's equations? Because they are incorrect > Because Maxwell's equations ( Lorentz transformations) Maxwell's equations are not lorentz transforms > dont belong to inertial frames. No transform does > Because Maxwell's equations ( Lorentz transformations) > belong to another reference frame. Which? Nonsense .. this is just getting silly > What are Lorentz transformations? You wouldn't have a clue > Of course, now everybody thinks that difference between > these two math equations (conceptions) lies only in > speeds distinction. Noone does > Such understanding leads to all kinds of confusions. > # > What is Lorentz transformation? You still don't know > The Lorentz transformation describes transformation > of all particles physical parameters in the time of transition > from one inertial frame to some kind of another reference frame. Nope > Is this another reference frame inertial? Yes > No. Why? That answer isn't no. > In 1905 Poincare wrote that the Lorentz transformation creates > math group, which conforms of arise turning- point in the space, > which we call now 4D Minkowski space. Try again .. on second thoughts, don't > Again. > The Lorentz transformation describes the event in Minkowski space. Wrong .. totally > This math group describes rotation ( something that has three > dimensions parameters) in the 4D Minkowski space. > The Lorentz transformation describes only the transformations > ( rotation) of particle in the 4D Minkowski space. > # > Many physicists, including George FitzGerald, Joseph Larmor, > Hendrik Lorentz and Woldemar Voigt, had been discussing > the physics behind these equations since 1887. I think they may have stopped now > Larmor and Lorentz, who believed the luminiferous ether hypothesis, > were seeking the transformation under which Maxwell's equations > were invariant when transformed from the ether to a moving frame. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorentz_transformation > # > In this rotation Maxwell's equations ( Lorentz transformations) You are seriously clueless > change the homogenous and isotropic structure of Aether. > Maxwell's equations ( Lorentz transformations) create new > spherical reference frame. Reference frames don't have some 3D shape This is just getting ridiculous [snip rest of nonsense blissfully unread] Please .. learn some basic physics so that you don't appear such a fool when you write such nonsense.
From: funkenstein on 4 Feb 2010 09:21 On Jan 29, 9:11 am, socratus <isra...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > The Lorentz transformation, Minkowski space. > ===========. > The Galilean transformation belongs to each inertial frame. > The Galilean transformation fails to preserve Maxwell's equations. > [snip] > # > In my opinion the Universe ( as a whole) doesnt have gravity. A day of skiing will likely cure you of that opinion :)
|
Pages: 1 Prev: The Lorentz transformation, Minkowski space. Next: Another GPS controversy |