Prev: Solutions manual to Intermediate Accounting 13e Kieso
Next: water detected on moon before chandrayan went kaput - plentyof it
From: gabydewilde on 19 Sep 2009 23:08
On Sep 18, 6:58 am, "hanson" <han...(a)quick.net> wrote:
> "Sam Wormley" <sworml...(a)mchsi.com> wrote:
>
> Michelson–Morley experiment is best yet
> Local Lorentz invariance for light confirmed at highest precision yethttp://physicsworld.com/cws/m/1486/17632/article/news/40355
>
> "Physicists in Germany have performed the most precise
> Michelson-Morley experiment to date, confirming that the speed
> of light is the same in all directions. The experiment, which involves
>  rotating two optical cavities, is about 10 times more precise
> than previous experiments – and a hundred million times more
> precise than Michelson and Morley's 1887 measurement".
>
> hanson cites and wrote:
>
> Sam, it also say on that same page:
> drwho8 Sep 18, 2009 3:02 AM Astoria, United States writes:
> This does confirm that everyone involved was both right and wrong
> at the same time.
> Never mind the fact that what Michelson and Morley were looking
> for did not exist. So they were not wrong at all. (Or were they?)
> -- end cit.
>
> So, why are "they" still looking for the Aether if they are so
> convinced that it doesn't exist?... It's like SR & GR whose
> Einstein Dingleberries are still scurrying around looking for
> proof.. after more than 100 years... whether SR/GR is valid?...
>
> All that sounds like the Torah, the Bible and the Koran whose
> believers have been running around for millennia... insisting,
> but not being quite sure, that they have the patent for "truth"....
> Thanks for the laughs...ahahahaha... ahahahaha ahahanson
>
>

I'd say AMEN to that one.

From: gabydewilde on 21 Sep 2009 16:21
On Sep 21, 6:03 am, doug <x...(a)xx.com> wrote:
>[snip]

huh what was that?
From: doug on 21 Sep 2009 17:25


gabydewilde wrote:

> On Sep 21, 6:03 am, doug <x...(a)xx.com> wrote:
>
>>[snip]
>
>
> huh what was that?

Just me showing your ignorance of science again.
From: gabydewilde on 22 Sep 2009 17:23
On Sep 21, 11:25 pm, doug <x...(a)xx.com> wrote:
> gabydewilde wrote:
> > On Sep 21, 6:03 am, doug <x...(a)xx.com> wrote:
>
> >>[snip]
>
> > huh what was that?
>
> Just me showing your ignorance of science again.

You are confused again.

I was showing my willful ignorance towards anything you have to say
about anything.

doug makes science look like kids playing in the sandbox.

this is all true,
From: doug on 22 Sep 2009 18:42


gabydewilde wrote:
> On Sep 21, 11:25 pm, doug <x...(a)xx.com> wrote:
>
>>gabydewilde wrote:
>>
>>>On Sep 21, 6:03 am, doug <x...(a)xx.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>[snip]
>>
>>>huh what was that?
>>
>>Just me showing your ignorance of science again.
>
>
> You are confused again.

No, you keep making my point for me.
>
> I was showing my willful ignorance towards anything you have to say
> about anything.

Yes, you have willful ignorance of science and will remain a crank.
>
> doug makes science look like kids playing in the sandbox.

It is clear that you never made it through your english classes
either.
>
> this is all true,
 |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2
Prev: Solutions manual to Intermediate Accounting 13e Kieso
Next: water detected on moon before chandrayan went kaput - plentyof it