The Necessity of an experiment (classical electrodynamics) that should have been done 100 years ago
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Dark Energy: The problem with Einstein's Cosmological Constant is that there's no physics behind it
Next: see what the culture of a fake Doppler shift spawns Chapt 8 #131; ATOM TOTALITY
From: rick_s on 3 Jun 2010 15:45 In article <889f92c9-b7a1-47cc-8a78-86e06dd33178(a)v12g2000prb.googlegroups.com>, abhilashsidhakodu(a)gmail.com says... > > >hello Uncle Al > >thank you for your reply. > >now would you please answer this question. > > > >consider two observers -both of them at rest >(or at rest with respect to each other)- >and are watching the same (or similar) phenomenon - >let's say a constant stream of electrons travelling at 0.1C. >Both the observers are equidistant from this stream of electrons, >and all other parameters remaining the same. >. >now is it possible for these two observers to measure different >values >for - >distance travelled by the electron stream in unit time, >calculate different values for time dialation and > measure different values for the strength of the magnetic >/electric field components > >thanking you Thats a silly question because at every accident, you get a hundred different eye witness accounts. The problem has always been to get people to see the SAME results. Look at Pons and Fleishman. It happened. Everyone else said no it didn't. That went on for several years until someone took an electron microscope and took some pictures of some hydrogen atoms embedded by laser under the surface of a palladium bar. You could see teh heat rising off the bar. It was at that point, the NAVY said they did some experiments which showed cold fusion was valid science. Sinmce they look after nukes, you would expect that they would pretend they knew what they were doing. Or that at least someone did. How did Pons and Fleishman get that far? Oh they have a huge history about that, but what you won't hear, is that I sent a letter to the university and told them. So when they did their excperiment and got results, they got overexcited, not knowing who else really had this knowledge and went public with a press conference probably to try and flush other people out who might know. But you know that until they actually did the science, no one would have believed it. Most people didn't believe it even when they showed their results. |