Prev: Sleeping Satellite - Space (YouTube)
Next: Fundamental equation: body color=excrement color, and its inequation
From: knews4u2chew on 13 Mar 2010 16:19
On Mar 13, 11:24 am, Ioonyrod <iarn...(a)yahoo.com> snipped, lied, and
spewed in order to distract:
> On Mar 13, 12:40 am, knowsNISTdrylab(a)insidejoblies:
>
> > On Mar 12, 10:41 pm, "Peter Webb"
>
> > <webbfam...(a)DIESPAMDIEoptusnet.com.au> wrote:
> > > If you have a more plausible theory than the explanation in the NIST report,
> > > I would love to hear it.
No.
You wouldn't.
You've proven it.

>
NIST dry-lab'd the conclusions.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LrNF6ulrWao
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iXTlaqXsm4k&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v3mudruFzNw&feature=related

> > > Or is the official explanation the most plausible that you know of, as well?
>
No.
Buildings don't collapse like that.
If they did we wouldn't need controlled demolition.
We could just start a few fires on a few floors and watch them
"collapse."
www.ae911truth.org
http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/content.php?TOCPJ/2009/00000002/00000001/7TOCPJ.SGM

> > Do you believe in Coincidence Theories?
>
> > I don't.
Yet that is the "official" line of events.
>
> You don't believe in proven facts, nutbag.
>
I believe you are a lying windbag from Mossad and/or a pathological
liar.

The facts are right here.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eDvNS9iMjzA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iXTlaqXsm4k&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v3mudruFzNw&feature=related
If you disagree you can surely post a response to this analysis right
there on youtube.
I'm sure you can post some name calling and arm waving "debunked" or
"dismissed."

> You actually believe in sideways gravity!

No.
You keep lying and say stupid things I never said.
It takes explosive force to launch beams weighing tons hundreds of
feet laterally.
They weren't made of rubber an didn't jump 600 feet sideways.

>You believe in cartoon magic

I believe the WTC "cartoon" caveman "attack" is a fraud by the Elite
Magi.

> silent and invisible explosives.

118 eye witnesses say otherwise.
What were you doing?
Watching Maury?

>You believe 16+ seconds is 6 seconds.

WTC 7 Fell at free fall.
NIST admits it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v3mudruFzNw&feature=related

> You're certifiable insane AND a pathological liar. FACT.

Projection noted.

NIST is not addressing the evidence.
They are dry - labbing.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4026073566596731782#
From: Peter Webb on 13 Mar 2010 23:48
Do you have a more plausible explanation of what happened than that in the
NIST report?

If so, what is it?

Or is the NIST explanation the most plausible you know of?


 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Sleeping Satellite - Space (YouTube)
Next: Fundamental equation: body color=excrement color, and its inequation