Prev: New Forum: BulletProof, Bitmap Steganography, XOR
Next: The Winds of Change - The Three Snake Oils of Cryptography.
From: Maaartin on 12 Jun 2010 18:07 On Jun 12, 11:08 pm, adacrypt <austin.oby...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > The mathematics are so well established that proof is neither possible > (since all of the theorems are old hat for centuries) nor necessary - > ask any mathematician. It seems like you've never met a mathematician. > Vector cryptography uses the entire three-dimensional space and is > patently unbreakable to anyone who has the mathematics to understand > it. Your assumption the people talking to you have troubles with vector algebra is not even funny. > If your mathematics were up to it you would not need to ask these > questions because they would be self evident to you but clearly that > is not the case - the fault is yours - there is no way that anybody > can lie in mathematics - when I post something that is expected to be > controversial I make sure the maths are correct What is you math education? Many folks here have PhD in math or CS, many of them are/was teaching math on a university. > because of all the > well informed mathematicians in sci crypt who seldom post anything but > read everything they see and they are my real critics The real critics are those keeping quiet? > No. I am not a fraud or a bluffer - you don't seem to know enough to > be able to tell the difference between mathematics that requires proof > and things that are not needed to be proved. This one is the best! > I hope this answers your unjust accusations - adacrypt Maybe not, but it says a lot. |