The center of gravity
in [Relativity]
|
From: purple on 26 Apr 2010 19:48 On 4/26/2010 5:31 PM, BURT wrote: > On Apr 26, 2:58 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: >> On 4/26/2010 1:44 PM, BURT wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>> On Apr 26, 11:35 am, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: >>>> On 4/26/2010 1:17 PM, BURT wrote: >> >>>>> On Apr 26, 10:06 am, Don Stockbauer<donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> On Apr 25, 6:18 pm, BURT<macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >>>>>>> So science is independant of Mind? Where then did it come from? >>>>>>> Where did life come from? >> >>>>>> What's beyond the causal horizon? >> >>>>> There is no such thing. There is hypersphere form of a closed >>>>> universe. >> >>>>> Mitch Raemsch >> >>>> That, fool, is a model, it isn't necessarily the reality. There are >>>> people who suggest the universe is shaped like a dodecahedron. >> >>>> <http://www.world-science.net/exclusives/exclusives-nfrm/041005_univsh...> >> >>> A closed universe and a round higher dimension of space is the >>> reality. >> >> If it is that would be the only, repeat ONLY, sphere that >> exists anywhere. There are no natural circles or spheres >> in the universe.- Hide quoted text - >> >> - Show quoted text - > > Gravity is round. There are no wrinkles in time. > > Mitch Raemsch You make these statements without any foundation in fact. You "teach like a religious preacher."
From: BURT on 26 Apr 2010 20:01 On Apr 26, 4:48 pm, purple <pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > On 4/26/2010 5:31 PM, BURT wrote: > > > > > > > On Apr 26, 2:58 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > >> On 4/26/2010 1:44 PM, BURT wrote: > > >>> On Apr 26, 11:35 am, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > >>>> On 4/26/2010 1:17 PM, BURT wrote: > > >>>>> On Apr 26, 10:06 am, Don Stockbauer<donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>> On Apr 25, 6:18 pm, BURT<macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >>>>>>> So science is independant of Mind? Where then did it come from? > >>>>>>> Where did life come from? > > >>>>>> What's beyond the causal horizon? > > >>>>> There is no such thing. There is hypersphere form of a closed > >>>>> universe. > > >>>>> Mitch Raemsch > > >>>> That, fool, is a model, it isn't necessarily the reality. There are > >>>> people who suggest the universe is shaped like a dodecahedron. > > >>>> <http://www.world-science.net/exclusives/exclusives-nfrm/041005_univsh...> > > >>> A closed universe and a round higher dimension of space is the > >>> reality. > > >> If it is that would be the only, repeat ONLY, sphere that > >> exists anywhere. There are no natural circles or spheres > >> in the universe.- Hide quoted text - > > >> - Show quoted text - > > > Gravity is round. There are no wrinkles in time. > > > Mitch Raemsch > > You make these statements without any foundation in fact. You > "teach like a religious preacher."- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Einstein's space curve is closed and round. The strength of gravity is round. Time shells slowed by it are round. Mitch Raemsch
From: purple on 26 Apr 2010 22:36 On 4/26/2010 7:01 PM, BURT wrote: > On Apr 26, 4:48 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: >> On 4/26/2010 5:31 PM, BURT wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>> On Apr 26, 2:58 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: >>>> On 4/26/2010 1:44 PM, BURT wrote: >> >>>>> On Apr 26, 11:35 am, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 4/26/2010 1:17 PM, BURT wrote: >> >>>>>>> On Apr 26, 10:06 am, Don Stockbauer<donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> On Apr 25, 6:18 pm, BURT<macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> So science is independant of Mind? Where then did it come from? >>>>>>>>> Where did life come from? >> >>>>>>>> What's beyond the causal horizon? >> >>>>>>> There is no such thing. There is hypersphere form of a closed >>>>>>> universe. >> >>>>>>> Mitch Raemsch >> >>>>>> That, fool, is a model, it isn't necessarily the reality. There are >>>>>> people who suggest the universe is shaped like a dodecahedron. >> >>>>>> <http://www.world-science.net/exclusives/exclusives-nfrm/041005_univsh...> >> >>>>> A closed universe and a round higher dimension of space is the >>>>> reality. >> >>>> If it is that would be the only, repeat ONLY, sphere that >>>> exists anywhere. There are no natural circles or spheres >>>> in the universe.- Hide quoted text - >> >>>> - Show quoted text - >> >>> Gravity is round. There are no wrinkles in time. >> >>> Mitch Raemsch >> >> You make these statements without any foundation in fact. You >> "teach like a religious preacher."- Hide quoted text - >> >> - Show quoted text - > > Einstein's space curve is closed and round. > The strength of gravity is round. > Time shells slowed by it are round. > > Mitch Raemsch Religion, not science.
From: BURT on 26 Apr 2010 22:53 On Apr 26, 7:36 pm, purple <pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > On 4/26/2010 7:01 PM, BURT wrote: > > > > > > > On Apr 26, 4:48 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > >> On 4/26/2010 5:31 PM, BURT wrote: > > >>> On Apr 26, 2:58 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > >>>> On 4/26/2010 1:44 PM, BURT wrote: > > >>>>> On Apr 26, 11:35 am, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > >>>>>> On 4/26/2010 1:17 PM, BURT wrote: > > >>>>>>> On Apr 26, 10:06 am, Don Stockbauer<donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>> On Apr 25, 6:18 pm, BURT<macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> So science is independant of Mind? Where then did it come from? > >>>>>>>>> Where did life come from? > > >>>>>>>> What's beyond the causal horizon? > > >>>>>>> There is no such thing. There is hypersphere form of a closed > >>>>>>> universe. > > >>>>>>> Mitch Raemsch > > >>>>>> That, fool, is a model, it isn't necessarily the reality. There are > >>>>>> people who suggest the universe is shaped like a dodecahedron. > > >>>>>> <http://www.world-science.net/exclusives/exclusives-nfrm/041005_univsh...> > > >>>>> A closed universe and a round higher dimension of space is the > >>>>> reality. > > >>>> If it is that would be the only, repeat ONLY, sphere that > >>>> exists anywhere. There are no natural circles or spheres > >>>> in the universe.- Hide quoted text - > > >>>> - Show quoted text - > > >>> Gravity is round. There are no wrinkles in time. > > >>> Mitch Raemsch > > >> You make these statements without any foundation in fact. You > >> "teach like a religious preacher."- Hide quoted text - > > >> - Show quoted text - > > > Einstein's space curve is closed and round. > > The strength of gravity is round. > > Time shells slowed by it are round. > > > Mitch Raemsch > > Religion, not science.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Science will find that gravity's curve is a round closed curve instead of parabolic. Gravity curve is three dimensional which makes it a sphere curve of geometry that orginates at its center and radiats outward till the end of gravity's range. Mitch Raemsch
From: Don Stockbauer on 29 Apr 2010 18:19
On Apr 26, 9:53 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Apr 26, 7:36 pm, purple <pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On 4/26/2010 7:01 PM, BURT wrote: > > > > On Apr 26, 4:48 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > > >> On 4/26/2010 5:31 PM, BURT wrote: > > > >>> On Apr 26, 2:58 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > > >>>> On 4/26/2010 1:44 PM, BURT wrote: > > > >>>>> On Apr 26, 11:35 am, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > > >>>>>> On 4/26/2010 1:17 PM, BURT wrote: > > > >>>>>>> On Apr 26, 10:06 am, Don Stockbauer<donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >>>>>>>> On Apr 25, 6:18 pm, BURT<macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> So science is independant of Mind? Where then did it come from? > > >>>>>>>>> Where did life come from? > > > >>>>>>>> What's beyond the causal horizon? > > > >>>>>>> There is no such thing. There is hypersphere form of a closed > > >>>>>>> universe. > > > >>>>>>> Mitch Raemsch > > > >>>>>> That, fool, is a model, it isn't necessarily the reality. There are > > >>>>>> people who suggest the universe is shaped like a dodecahedron. > > > >>>>>> <http://www.world-science.net/exclusives/exclusives-nfrm/041005_univsh...> > > > >>>>> A closed universe and a round higher dimension of space is the > > >>>>> reality. > > > >>>> If it is that would be the only, repeat ONLY, sphere that > > >>>> exists anywhere. There are no natural circles or spheres > > >>>> in the universe.- Hide quoted text - > > > >>>> - Show quoted text - > > > >>> Gravity is round. There are no wrinkles in time. > > > >>> Mitch Raemsch > > > >> You make these statements without any foundation in fact. You > > >> "teach like a religious preacher."- Hide quoted text - > > > >> - Show quoted text - > > > > Einstein's space curve is closed and round. > > > The strength of gravity is round. > > > Time shells slowed by it are round. > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > Religion, not science.- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > Science will find that gravity's curve is a round closed curve > instead of parabolic. Gravity curve is three dimensional which makes > it a sphere curve of geometry that orginates at its center and radiats > outward till the end of gravity's range. > > Mitch Raemsch So what is the "End of gravity's range", Mitchy-poo. |