From: BURT on
Gravity gives space a geometric center. Einstein's curve in three
dimensions is a sphere.

Mitch Raemsch
From: Antares 531 on
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 13:10:34 -0700 (PDT), BURT <macromitch(a)yahoo.com>
wrote:

>Gravity gives space a geometric center. Einstein's curve in three
>dimensions is a sphere.
>
>Mitch Raemsch
>
Mitch, where is the center of the surface of a sphere?

Our perceivable space/time is made up of three spatial dimensions and
one temporal dimension that seem to be a part of a multiverse of ten
spatial dimensions and one temporal dimension. The spatial dimensions
we perceive were rolled up like a scroll to less than a Planck Length
before the Big Bang, but are now unrolled to a nearly infinite radius
of curvature. Follow any line in this 3-d space we perceive and that
line would eventually close back upon itself, but it would take a VERY
long time to travel the length of this line, even at the speed of
light.

Just my 4 cents worth. Inflation has forced me to raise the price a
bit.

Gordon
From: BURT on
On Apr 20, 1:47 pm, Antares 531 <gordonlrDEL...(a)swbell.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 13:10:34 -0700 (PDT), BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
> >Gravity gives space a geometric center. Einstein's curve in three
> >dimensions is a sphere.
>
> >Mitch Raemsch
>
> Mitch, where is the center of the surface of a sphere?
>
> Our perceivable space/time is made up of three spatial dimensions and
> one temporal dimension that seem to be a part of a multiverse of ten
> spatial dimensions and one temporal dimension. The spatial dimensions
> we perceive were rolled up like a scroll to less than a Planck Length
> before the Big Bang, but are now unrolled to a nearly infinite radius
> of curvature. Follow any line in this 3-d space we perceive and that
> line would eventually close back upon itself, but it would take a VERY
> long time to travel the length of this line, even at the speed of
> light.
>
> Just my 4 cents worth. Inflation has forced me to raise the price a
> bit.
>
> Gordon

There is a center to the aether hypersphere. There is a 3d boundary
where the range of spherical gravity geometry ends.

Mitch Raemsch
From: Don Stockbauer on
On Apr 20, 5:25 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Apr 20, 1:47 pm, Antares 531 <gordonlrDEL...(a)swbell.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 13:10:34 -0700 (PDT), BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com>
> > wrote:
>
> > >Gravity gives space a geometric center. Einstein's curve in three
> > >dimensions is a sphere.
>
> > >Mitch Raemsch
>
> > Mitch, where is the center of the surface of a sphere?
>
> > Our perceivable space/time is made up of three spatial dimensions and
> > one temporal dimension that seem to be a part of a multiverse of ten
> > spatial dimensions and one temporal dimension. The spatial dimensions
> > we perceive were rolled up like a scroll to less than a Planck Length
> > before the Big Bang, but are now unrolled to a nearly infinite radius
> > of curvature. Follow any line in this 3-d space we perceive and that
> > line would eventually close back upon itself, but it would take a VERY
> > long time to travel the length of this line, even at the speed of
> > light.
>
> > Just my 4 cents worth. Inflation has forced me to raise the price a
> > bit.
>
> > Gordon
>
> There is a center to the aether hypersphere. There is a 3d boundary
> where the range of spherical gravity geometry ends.
>
> Mitch Raemsch

Do you feel sick?
From: Antares 531 on
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 21:43:03 +1000, SolomonW <SolomonW(a)nospamMail.com>
wrote:

>On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 15:52:46 -0500, Antares 531 wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 00:56:25 +1000, SolomonW <SolomonW(a)nospamMail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 15:47:37 -0500, Antares 531 wrote:
>>>
>>>> Our perceivable space/time is made up of three spatial dimensions and
>>>> one temporal dimension that seem to be a part of a multiverse of ten
>>>> spatial dimensions and one temporal dimension.
>>>
>>>
>>>This is still yet to be shown.
>>>
>> I agree, but String Theory, SuperString Theory and Membrane Theory,
>> now called SS-M Theory, are giving us some very substantial reasons to
>> think this may be true. Just hang on for a while and see what
>> develops.
>
>It has been 50 years already with little to show, how much longer do you
>think it needs?
>
String Theory has stood the test of time for 50 years and has not been
falsified. Maybe it is due some marginal consideration as being valid.
It sure does match up with lots of things we can and have validated.