From: RichA on
Just some info. Wow!! Genuine "optic glass" (as opposed to coke
bottle bottoms?)

http://www.samyang.pl/product,147,category,5,samyang_6501300mm_mc_if_f816

The example moon shot they show with it is pathetic. No doubt linked
as much to seeing changes during the inordinantly long exposure needed
with an f16 focal length as much as the horrible optics.

A better choice would be the 500mm they offer since it has ED glass at
least:

http://www.samyang.pl/product,80,category,5,samyang_500mm_f8_preset_ed_if_mc



From: RustY � on

"RichA" <rander3127(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:4a6f18ed-ece2-46c9-ae12-7ea686efa60b(a)j19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
> long exposure needed
> with an f16 focal length ...............

What?


From: MG on

"RichA" <rander3127(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:4a6f18ed-ece2-46c9-ae12-7ea686efa60b(a)j19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
> Just some info. Wow!! Genuine "optic glass" (as opposed to coke
> bottle bottoms?)
>
> http://www.samyang.pl/product,147,category,5,samyang_6501300mm_mc_if_f816
>
> The example moon shot they show with it is pathetic. No doubt linked
> as much to seeing changes during the inordinantly long exposure needed
> with an f16 focal length as much as the horrible optics.
>
> A better choice would be the 500mm they offer since it has ED glass at
> least:
>
> http://www.samyang.pl/product,80,category,5,samyang_500mm_f8_preset_ed_if_mc
>

The enclosure is made of metal, so it should produce excellent images.

MG


From: Bruce on
On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 00:22:27 -0800 (PST), RichA <rander3127(a)gmail.com>
wrote:

>Just some info. Wow!! Genuine "optic glass" (as opposed to coke
>bottle bottoms?)


Given that it has been translated from Korean and is displayed on a
Polish web site, I would expect a few mistakes here and there.

Still, I'm very happy with my Samyang 85mm f/1.4. I broke the plastic
bayonet mount lens hood after only a few uses so replaced it with a
nice metal hood. I thought you would be pleased. ;-)

From: Robert Coe on
On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 10:29:59 -0000, "RustY �" <No.Mail(a)All.Thanks> wrote:
:
: "RichA" <rander3127(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
: news:4a6f18ed-ece2-46c9-ae12-7ea686efa60b(a)j19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
: > long exposure needed
: > with an f16 focal length ...............
:
: What?

Don't be snarky. Rich has no particular reason to know the difference berween
aperture and focal length. Neither of them is made of plastic.

Bob