From: RichA on 31 Dec 2009 03:22 Just some info. Wow!! Genuine "optic glass" (as opposed to coke bottle bottoms?) http://www.samyang.pl/product,147,category,5,samyang_6501300mm_mc_if_f816 The example moon shot they show with it is pathetic. No doubt linked as much to seeing changes during the inordinantly long exposure needed with an f16 focal length as much as the horrible optics. A better choice would be the 500mm they offer since it has ED glass at least: http://www.samyang.pl/product,80,category,5,samyang_500mm_f8_preset_ed_if_mc
From: RustY � on 31 Dec 2009 05:29 "RichA" <rander3127(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:4a6f18ed-ece2-46c9-ae12-7ea686efa60b(a)j19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com... > long exposure needed > with an f16 focal length ............... What?
From: MG on 31 Dec 2009 05:55 "RichA" <rander3127(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:4a6f18ed-ece2-46c9-ae12-7ea686efa60b(a)j19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com... > Just some info. Wow!! Genuine "optic glass" (as opposed to coke > bottle bottoms?) > > http://www.samyang.pl/product,147,category,5,samyang_6501300mm_mc_if_f816 > > The example moon shot they show with it is pathetic. No doubt linked > as much to seeing changes during the inordinantly long exposure needed > with an f16 focal length as much as the horrible optics. > > A better choice would be the 500mm they offer since it has ED glass at > least: > > http://www.samyang.pl/product,80,category,5,samyang_500mm_f8_preset_ed_if_mc > The enclosure is made of metal, so it should produce excellent images. MG
From: Bruce on 31 Dec 2009 07:53 On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 00:22:27 -0800 (PST), RichA <rander3127(a)gmail.com> wrote: >Just some info. Wow!! Genuine "optic glass" (as opposed to coke >bottle bottoms?) Given that it has been translated from Korean and is displayed on a Polish web site, I would expect a few mistakes here and there. Still, I'm very happy with my Samyang 85mm f/1.4. I broke the plastic bayonet mount lens hood after only a few uses so replaced it with a nice metal hood. I thought you would be pleased. ;-)
From: Robert Coe on 31 Dec 2009 13:55 On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 10:29:59 -0000, "RustY �" <No.Mail(a)All.Thanks> wrote: : : "RichA" <rander3127(a)gmail.com> wrote in message : news:4a6f18ed-ece2-46c9-ae12-7ea686efa60b(a)j19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com... : > long exposure needed : > with an f16 focal length ............... : : What? Don't be snarky. Rich has no particular reason to know the difference berween aperture and focal length. Neither of them is made of plastic. Bob
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Prev: Nikon determined to obsolete old lenses Next: Photo of The First Day of the year |