Prev: A Fireside Chat With johnreed, July 21, 2010 update
Next: accelerator conference this week
From: PD on 22 Jul 2010 10:58
On Jul 22, 9:38 am, Jacko <jackokr...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> If the LHC doesn't come up trumps, then the 4 billion plus will be
> accounted for in front of the people.

Agreed. But rest easy. It will produce lots of physics.

> Large civil engineering projects
> with no purpose, and which do no serve to further the purpose, are too
> expensive to afford. Consequential nuclear
> research from things such as the 'Chenobyl decelerator' shall be a
> really experimental 'on site living' experience for those into
> physics, who wouldn't have to know anything about gravity.

From: Hikaru Masayoshi on 22 Jul 2010 13:58
On Jul 22, 4:00 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 22, 1:37 am, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jul 21, 4:05 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Jul 21, 1:26 am, john <vega...(a)accesscomm.ca> wrote:
>
> > > > But this is obvious- everything has to be
> > > > infinitely complex at no matter what
> > > > scale, because there can be no smallest.
>
> > > This is a religious statement.
>
> > > Thus your claim that the electron is not a point is also an article of
> > > faith and has no bearing on any experimental evidence.
>
> > > > And our own spectrum of photons is not
> > > > the only one. There are both
> > > > smaller and larger spectra at regular
> > > > intervals as one contemplates different
> > > > scales.
>
> > > > Guess what, interminably ego-centric
> > > > people- ours is not the only, or best,
> > > > *anything*
>
> > > > john
>
> > -------------
> > only retarded mathematician
> > parrots -can think that
> > any particle cam be a point!!
> > Y.P
> > -------------------- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> Only aging bridge engineers would think that absolutely everything
> MUST have volume.

the science is materialistic, then yes,
you just made yourself a disservice

please define the consistency of no volume

hahahanson, good bye
From: BURT on 22 Jul 2010 15:09
On Jul 22, 7:29 am, bert <herbertglazie...(a)msn.com> wrote:
> On Jul 22, 10:19 am, Jacko <jackokr...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 22 July, 15:00, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Jul 22, 1:37 am, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Jul 21, 4:05 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > On Jul 21, 1:26 am, john <vega...(a)accesscomm.ca> wrote:
>
> > > > > > But this is obvious- everything has to be
> > > > > > infinitely complex at no matter what
> > > > > > scale, because there can be no smallest.
>
> > > > > This is a religious statement.
>
> > > > > Thus your claim that the electron is not a point is also an article of
> > > > > faith and has no bearing on any experimental evidence.
>
> > > > > > And our own spectrum of photons is not
> > > > > > the only one. There are both
> > > > > > smaller and larger spectra at regular
> > > > > > intervals as one contemplates different
> > > > > > scales.
>
> > > > > > Guess what, interminably ego-centric
> > > > > > people- ours is not the only, or best,
> > > > > > *anything*
>
> > > > > > john
>
> > > > -------------
> > > > only retarded mathematician
> > > > parrots -can think that
> > > > any particle cam be a point!!
> > > > Y.P
> > > > -------------------- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > Only aging bridge engineers would think that absolutely everything
> > > MUST have volume.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > Yes, bridge engineering... Problem specification: move things from one
> > side of a rift to another, bring all ideas and goods in contact with
> > all others. Avoid the island mentality, remember the Hitite metal
> > incident, and build all needed tools for the job.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> What good is a point(Dot) in the quantum realm  It don't fit   TreBert- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Space and time are comprised of a cintinuum of the infinitely small
and the point quantum fits that.


Mitch Raemsch
From: michael michalchik on 25 Jul 2010 15:24
On Jul 21, 11:37 pm, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 21, 4:05 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jul 21, 1:26 am, john <vega...(a)accesscomm.ca> wrote:
>
> > > But this is obvious- everything has to be
> > > infinitely complex at no matter what
> > > scale, because there can be no smallest.
>
> > This is a religious statement.
>
> > Thus your claim that the electron is not a point is also an article of
> > faith and has no bearing on any experimental evidence.
>
> > > And our own spectrum of photons is not
> > > the only one. There are both
> > > smaller and larger spectra at regular
> > > intervals as one contemplates different
> > > scales.
>
> > > Guess what, interminably ego-centric
> > > people- ours is not the only, or best,
> > > *anything*
>
> > > john
>
> -------------
> only retarded mathematician
> parrots -can think that
> any particle cam be a point!!
> Y.P
> -------------------

Electrons are not points they are probability fields localized around
a point that interact with other objects through virtual particle
fields in ways that transfer quanta of energy the way a point particle
would if it could collide with something.
From: BURT on 25 Jul 2010 16:53
On Jul 25, 12:24 pm, michael michalchik <michael.michalc...(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Jul 21, 11:37 pm, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jul 21, 4:05 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Jul 21, 1:26 am, john <vega...(a)accesscomm.ca> wrote:
>
> > > > But this is obvious- everything has to be
> > > > infinitely complex at no matter what
> > > > scale, because there can be no smallest.
>
> > > This is a religious statement.
>
> > > Thus your claim that the electron is not a point is also an article of
> > > faith and has no bearing on any experimental evidence.
>
> > > > And our own spectrum of photons is not
> > > > the only one. There are both
> > > > smaller and larger spectra at regular
> > > > intervals as one contemplates different
> > > > scales.
>
> > > > Guess what, interminably ego-centric
> > > > people- ours is not the only, or best,
> > > > *anything*
>
> > > > john
>
> > -------------
> > only retarded mathematician
> > parrots -can think that
> > any particle cam be a point!!
> > Y.P
> > -------------------
>
> Electrons are not points they are probability fields localized around
> a point that interact with other objects through virtual particle
> fields in ways that transfer quanta of energy the way a point particle
> would if it could collide with something.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Electrons are points of energy that quantum mechically vibrate by
being pushed by their immaterial quantum waves.

Mitch Raemsch
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2
Prev: A Fireside Chat With johnreed, July 21, 2010 update
Next: accelerator conference this week