The electron is not a point- it is a very complex structure
in [Physics]
|
Prev: nearness to the Nucleus of the Atom Totality Chapter 4, Missing Mass #227 Atom Totality
Next: The search for an electric dipole moment inside electrons
From: PD on 22 Jul 2010 10:00 On Jul 22, 1:37 am, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jul 21, 4:05 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Jul 21, 1:26 am, john <vega...(a)accesscomm.ca> wrote: > > > > But this is obvious- everything has to be > > > infinitely complex at no matter what > > > scale, because there can be no smallest. > > > This is a religious statement. > > > Thus your claim that the electron is not a point is also an article of > > faith and has no bearing on any experimental evidence. > > > > And our own spectrum of photons is not > > > the only one. There are both > > > smaller and larger spectra at regular > > > intervals as one contemplates different > > > scales. > > > > Guess what, interminably ego-centric > > > people- ours is not the only, or best, > > > *anything* > > > > john > > ------------- > only retarded mathematician > parrots -can think that > any particle cam be a point!! > Y.P > -------------------- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Only aging bridge engineers would think that absolutely everything MUST have volume.
From: Jacko on 22 Jul 2010 10:19 On 22 July, 15:00, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jul 22, 1:37 am, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Jul 21, 4:05 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Jul 21, 1:26 am, john <vega...(a)accesscomm.ca> wrote: > > > > > But this is obvious- everything has to be > > > > infinitely complex at no matter what > > > > scale, because there can be no smallest. > > > > This is a religious statement. > > > > Thus your claim that the electron is not a point is also an article of > > > faith and has no bearing on any experimental evidence. > > > > > And our own spectrum of photons is not > > > > the only one. There are both > > > > smaller and larger spectra at regular > > > > intervals as one contemplates different > > > > scales. > > > > > Guess what, interminably ego-centric > > > > people- ours is not the only, or best, > > > > *anything* > > > > > john > > > ------------- > > only retarded mathematician > > parrots -can think that > > any particle cam be a point!! > > Y.P > > -------------------- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > Only aging bridge engineers would think that absolutely everything > MUST have volume.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Yes, bridge engineering... Problem specification: move things from one side of a rift to another, bring all ideas and goods in contact with all others. Avoid the island mentality, remember the Hitite metal incident, and build all needed tools for the job.
From: bert on 22 Jul 2010 10:29 On Jul 22, 10:19 am, Jacko <jackokr...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 22 July, 15:00, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Jul 22, 1:37 am, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Jul 21, 4:05 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Jul 21, 1:26 am, john <vega...(a)accesscomm.ca> wrote: > > > > > > But this is obvious- everything has to be > > > > > infinitely complex at no matter what > > > > > scale, because there can be no smallest. > > > > > This is a religious statement. > > > > > Thus your claim that the electron is not a point is also an article of > > > > faith and has no bearing on any experimental evidence. > > > > > > And our own spectrum of photons is not > > > > > the only one. There are both > > > > > smaller and larger spectra at regular > > > > > intervals as one contemplates different > > > > > scales. > > > > > > Guess what, interminably ego-centric > > > > > people- ours is not the only, or best, > > > > > *anything* > > > > > > john > > > > ------------- > > > only retarded mathematician > > > parrots -can think that > > > any particle cam be a point!! > > > Y.P > > > -------------------- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > Only aging bridge engineers would think that absolutely everything > > MUST have volume.- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > Yes, bridge engineering... Problem specification: move things from one > side of a rift to another, bring all ideas and goods in contact with > all others. Avoid the island mentality, remember the Hitite metal > incident, and build all needed tools for the job.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - What good is a point(Dot) in the quantum realm It don't fit TreBert
From: Jacko on 22 Jul 2010 10:38 If the LHC doesn't come up trumps, then the 4 billion plus will be accounted for in front of the people. Large civil engineering projects with no purpose, and which do no serve to further the purpose, are too expensive to afford. Consequential nuclear research from things such as the 'Chenobyl decelerator' shall be a really experimental 'on site living' experience for those into physics, who wouldn't have to know anything about gravity.
From: PD on 22 Jul 2010 10:58
On Jul 22, 9:38 am, Jacko <jackokr...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > If the LHC doesn't come up trumps, then the 4 billion plus will be > accounted for in front of the people. Agreed. But rest easy. It will produce lots of physics. > Large civil engineering projects > with no purpose, and which do no serve to further the purpose, are too > expensive to afford. Consequential nuclear > research from things such as the 'Chenobyl decelerator' shall be a > really experimental 'on site living' experience for those into > physics, who wouldn't have to know anything about gravity. |