The i's don't have it
in [Math]
|
Prev: some backtracking in deriving speed of light from purely math considerations ; speed of light Chapt 19 #194; ATOM TOTALITY
Next: pseudosphere in deriving speed of light from purely math considerations ; Chapt 19 #195; ATOM TOTALITY
From: BURT on 23 Jun 2010 14:52 The i in the complex plane is equal to one and then the coefficient does the work. When you move your i around in the complex plane it does the same thing as One would combined with the coefficient. Imaginary numbers are i equal to one. And that means is they really are only your imagination. So stop moving your i around. i is not a quantitiy and doesn't belong in math. MItch Raemsch
From: porky_pig_jr on 23 Jun 2010 22:29 On Jun 23, 2:52 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: So stop moving your i around. Damn, they wouldn't listen. http://www.digital-street.com/img/tutorials/funny-eyes/11.png
From: Paul Hovnanian P.E. on 25 Jun 2010 01:04
BURT wrote: > > The i in the complex plane is equal to one and then the coefficient > does the work. When you move your i around in the complex plane it > does the same thing as One would combined with the coefficient. > Imaginary numbers are i equal to one. And that means is they really > are only your imagination. So stop moving your i around. i is not a > quantitiy and doesn't belong in math. But its perfectly OK to use 'j' (I'm an EE). -- Paul Hovnanian mailto:Paul(a)Hovnanian.com ------------------------------------------------------------------ RAM disk is *not* an installation procedure. |