Prev: Efficiency/style issues of import <module> vs. from <module> import <name>, ...
Next: Running a program from another program.
From: Neil Cerutti on 17 Jun 2010 13:45
What's the best way to do the inverse operation of the .join
function?

--
Neil Cerutti
From: nn on 17 Jun 2010 13:49

Neil Cerutti wrote:
> What's the best way to do the inverse operation of the .join
> function?
>
> --
> Neil Cerutti

split
From: MRAB on 17 Jun 2010 14:05
Neil Cerutti wrote:
> What's the best way to do the inverse operation of the .join
> function?
>
..split, possibly, although there will be problems if the string contains
other occurrences of the separator.
From: Ian Kelly on 17 Jun 2010 14:01
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Neil Cerutti <neilc(a)norwich.edu> wrote:
> What's the best way to do the inverse operation of the .join
> function?

Use the str.split method?
From: Neil Cerutti on 17 Jun 2010 15:08
On 2010-06-17, Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Neil Cerutti
> <neilc(a)norwich.edu> wrote:
>> What's the best way to do the inverse operation of the .join
>> function?
>
> Use the str.split method?

split is perfect except for what happens with an empty string.

--
Neil Cerutti
 |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Prev: Efficiency/style issues of import <module> vs. from <module> import <name>, ...
Next: Running a program from another program.