Prev: Fresnel drag and Demjanov's formula
Next: There are no anti forces to build anti matter
From: Sam Wormley on 26 Feb 2010 21:07
On 2/26/10 11:37 AM, Peter Muehlbauer wrote:
> "anorton"<anorton(a)removethis.ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
>
>> This paper has not been peer reviewed.
>> It is written by a materials scientist.
>> Two of its major references are other unreviewed blogs.
>> It is "published" by an organization that exists only to deny AGW.
>
> If you exchange AGW with GW, you made a perfect description of IPCC.
>
> Thanks.

Hey Peter--Don't forget to buy copies for all your buddies!

http://mariopiperni.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/idiots_guide_gwarming2.jpg


From: jerry warner on 26 Feb 2010 23:43


Mike Jr wrote:

> "SUMMARY
> Both raw and adjusted data from the NCDC has been examined for a
> selected Contiguous U. S. set of rural and urban stations, 48 each or
> one per State. The raw data provides 0.13 and 0.79 oC/century
> temperature increase for the rural and urban environments. The
> adjusted data provides 0.64 and 0.77 oC/century respectively. The
> rates for the raw data appear to correspond to the historical change
> of rural and urban U. S. populations and indicate warming is due to
> urban warming. Comparison of the adjusted data for the rural set to
> that of the raw data shows a systematic treatment that causes the
> rural adjusted set�s temperature rate of increase to be 5-fold more
> than that of the raw data. The adjusted urban data set�s and raw urban
> data set�s rates of temperature increase are the same. This suggests
> the consequence of the NCDC�s protocol for adjusting the data is to
> cause historical data to take on the time-line characteristics of
> urban data. The consequence intended or not, is to report a false rate
> of temperature increase for the Contiguous U. S."
>
> http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/images/stories/papers/originals/Rate_of_Temp_Change_Raw_and_Adjusted_NCDC_Data.pdf
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7K8u4LB8Jv0
>

WOW! This must mean that shamalaka upbanifstopilodia
mongolitnryrifes topilita gotf far shingu diapoligtidmoto
um endif ethnocentriaanimus?



>
> --Mike Jr.

From: Mike Jr on 27 Feb 2010 09:49
On Feb 26, 4:37 pm, James Inhofe <igorelaria...(a)ymail.com> wrote:
> On Feb 26, 4:20 pm, "I M @ good guy" <I...(a)good.guy> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 03:54:23 -0800 (PST), Mike Jr <n00s...(a)comcast.net>
> > wrote:
>
> > >"SUMMARY
> > >Both raw and adjusted data from the NCDC has been examined for a
> > >selected Contiguous U. S. set of rural and urban stations, 48 each or
> > >one per State. The raw data provides 0.13 and 0.79 oC/century
> > >temperature increase for the rural and urban environments. The
> > >adjusted data provides 0.64 and 0.77 oC/century respectively. The
> > >rates for the raw data appear to correspond to the historical change
> > >of rural and urban U. S. populations and indicate warming is due to
> > >urban warming. Comparison of the adjusted data for the rural set to
> > >that of the raw data shows a systematic treatment that causes the
> > >rural adjusted set’s temperature rate of increase to be 5-fold more
> > >than that of the raw data. The adjusted urban data set’s and raw urban
> > >data set’s rates of temperature increase are the same. This suggests
> > >the consequence of the NCDC’s protocol for adjusting the data is to
> > >cause historical data to take on the time-line characteristics of
> > >urban data. The consequence intended or not, is to report a false rate
> > >of temperature increase for the Contiguous U. S."
>
> > >http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/images/stories/papers/originals/Rat....
>
> > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7K8u4LB8Jv0
>
> > >--Mike Jr.

*> Science and Public Policy is a think tank whose members sit on the
*> boards of directors of many oil and coal companies

Really. Which Science and Public Policy board members exactly, and
which oil/coal company boards do they sit on?

BTW, thank you for being so transparent.

--Mike Jr.

From: Mike Collins on 27 Feb 2010 10:47
On 27 Feb, 14:49, Mike Jr <n00s...(a)comcast.net> wrote:
> On Feb 26, 4:37 pm, James Inhofe <igorelaria...(a)ymail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Feb 26, 4:20 pm, "I M @ good guy" <I...(a)good.guy> wrote:
>
> > > On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 03:54:23 -0800 (PST), Mike Jr <n00s...(a)comcast.net>
> > > wrote:
>
> > > >"SUMMARY
> > > >Both raw and adjusted data from the NCDC has been examined for a
> > > >selected Contiguous U. S. set of rural and urban stations, 48 each or
> > > >one per State. The raw data provides 0.13 and 0.79 oC/century
> > > >temperature increase for the rural and urban environments. The
> > > >adjusted data provides 0.64 and 0.77 oC/century respectively. The
> > > >rates for the raw data appear to correspond to the historical change
> > > >of rural and urban U. S. populations and indicate warming is due to
> > > >urban warming. Comparison of the adjusted data for the rural set to
> > > >that of the raw data shows a systematic treatment that causes the
> > > >rural adjusted set’s temperature rate of increase to be 5-fold more
> > > >than that of the raw data. The adjusted urban data set’s and raw urban
> > > >data set’s rates of temperature increase are the same. This suggests
> > > >the consequence of the NCDC’s protocol for adjusting the data is to
> > > >cause historical data to take on the time-line characteristics of
> > > >urban data. The consequence intended or not, is to report a false rate
> > > >of temperature increase for the Contiguous U. S."
>
> > > >http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/images/stories/papers/originals/Rat...
>
> > > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7K8u4LB8Jv0
>
> > > >--Mike Jr.
>
> *> Science and Public Policy is a think tank whose members sit on the
> *> boards of directors of many oil and coal companies
>
> Really.  Which Science and Public Policy board members exactly, and
> which oil/coal company boards do they sit on?
>
> BTW, thank you for being so transparent.
>
> --Mike Jr.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

You can find details of energy company funding of "Science and Public
Policy" on:
http://www.desmogblog.com

From: I M on 27 Feb 2010 21:20
On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 06:49:17 -0800 (PST), Mike Jr <n00spam(a)comcast.net>
wrote:

>On Feb 26, 4:37 pm, James Inhofe <igorelaria...(a)ymail.com> wrote:
>> On Feb 26, 4:20 pm, "I M @ good guy" <I...(a)good.guy> wrote:
>>
>> > On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 03:54:23 -0800 (PST), Mike Jr <n00s...(a)comcast.net>
>> > wrote:
>>
>> > >"SUMMARY
>> > >Both raw and adjusted data from the NCDC has been examined for a
>> > >selected Contiguous U. S. set of rural and urban stations, 48 each or
>> > >one per State. The raw data provides 0.13 and 0.79 oC/century
>> > >temperature increase for the rural and urban environments. The
>> > >adjusted data provides 0.64 and 0.77 oC/century respectively. The
>> > >rates for the raw data appear to correspond to the historical change
>> > >of rural and urban U. S. populations and indicate warming is due to
>> > >urban warming. Comparison of the adjusted data for the rural set to
>> > >that of the raw data shows a systematic treatment that causes the
>> > >rural adjusted set's temperature rate of increase to be 5-fold more
>> > >than that of the raw data. The adjusted urban data set's and raw urban
>> > >data set's rates of temperature increase are the same. This suggests
>> > >the consequence of the NCDC's protocol for adjusting the data is to
>> > >cause historical data to take on the time-line characteristics of
>> > >urban data. The consequence intended or not, is to report a false rate
>> > >of temperature increase for the Contiguous U. S."
>>
>> > >http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/images/stories/papers/originals/Rat...
>>
>> > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7K8u4LB8Jv0
>>
>> > >--Mike Jr.
>
>*> Science and Public Policy is a think tank whose members sit on the
>*> boards of directors of many oil and coal companies
>
>Really. Which Science and Public Policy board members exactly, and
>which oil/coal company boards do they sit on?
>
>BTW, thank you for being so transparent.
>
>--Mike Jr.

Please learn how to correct attribution to
quoted text, I did not write any of the above ! ! !








First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3
Prev: Fresnel drag and Demjanov's formula
Next: There are no anti forces to build anti matter