Prev: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 295)
Next: E = m (c - Hd)^2
From: BURT on 26 Apr 2010 18:42
In fact there are two. They are the universal rates that GR and SR
slowdown from. The math is inverse Gamma slow for the Two Times that
express themselves together as one flow over energy.

Mitch Raemsch; Time Gravity
From: xxein on 26 Apr 2010 18:59
On Apr 26, 6:42 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> In fact there are two. They are the universal rates that GR and SR
> slowdown from. The math is inverse Gamma slow for the Two Times that
> express themselves together as one flow over energy.
>
> Mitch Raemsch; Time Gravity

xxein: The truth about Burt. Idiot.
From: BURT on 26 Apr 2010 19:05
On Apr 26, 3:59 pm, xxein <xx...(a)comcast.net> wrote:
> On Apr 26, 6:42 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > In fact there are two. They are the universal rates that GR and SR
> > slowdown from. The math is inverse Gamma slow for the Two Times that
> > express themselves together as one flow over energy.
>
> > Mitch Raemsch; Time Gravity
>
> xxein:  The truth about Burt.  Idiot.

Stephen Hawking uses the concept of two times.

Mitch Raemsch
From: Michael Helland on 26 Apr 2010 19:26
On Apr 26, 4:05 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Apr 26, 3:59 pm, xxein <xx...(a)comcast.net> wrote:
>
> > On Apr 26, 6:42 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > In fact there are two. They are the universal rates that GR and SR
> > > slowdown from. The math is inverse Gamma slow for the Two Times that
> > > express themselves together as one flow over energy.
>
> > > Mitch Raemsch; Time Gravity
>
> > xxein:  The truth about Burt.  Idiot.
>
> Stephen Hawking uses the concept of two times.

So does Einstein. So does Newton. So did the Greeks.

The question is organizing them into an information system. That's too
big of a job for equations to do properly.

So when you're dealing with equations, its best to simply ignore
absolute time altogether.

You can prove the world wrong of course, but I sincerely suggest
computation rather than equations for that line of thinking.
From: BURT on 26 Apr 2010 19:37
On Apr 26, 4:26 pm, Michael Helland <mobyd...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Apr 26, 4:05 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > On Apr 26, 3:59 pm, xxein <xx...(a)comcast.net> wrote:
>
> > > On Apr 26, 6:42 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > In fact there are two. They are the universal rates that GR and SR
> > > > slowdown from. The math is inverse Gamma slow for the Two Times that
> > > > express themselves together as one flow over energy.
>
> > > > Mitch Raemsch; Time Gravity
>
> > > xxein:  The truth about Burt.  Idiot.
>
> > Stephen Hawking uses the concept of two times.
>
> So does Einstein. So does Newton. So did the Greeks.
>
> The question is organizing them into an information system. That's too
> big of a job for equations to do properly.
>
> So when you're dealing with equations, its best to simply ignore
> absolute time altogether.
>
> You can prove the world wrong of course, but I sincerely suggest
> computation rather than equations for that line of thinking.

For truth's sake Einstein never saw that time was more than one
slowdown but his theories vouch for it.

How do you back up your claim about Newton?
Where are the Greeks two times? One with the Sun the other with the
dial?

Mitch Raemsch
 |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3
Prev: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 295)
Next: E = m (c - Hd)^2