The use of transistors
in [Design]
|
From: John Larkin on 6 Dec 2009 11:14 On Sun, 06 Dec 2009 22:42:04 +1100, Sylvia Else <sylvia(a)not.at.this.address> wrote: >Jamie wrote: >> Gut into a discussion the other day about the use of >> bipolar transistors. >> >> I told them I was >> negatively biased on PNPs >> >> > >What's your current opinion on that? > >Sylvia. A little charge injection enhances the experience. John
From: krw on 6 Dec 2009 12:42 On Sun, 06 Dec 2009 23:31:14 +1100, Sylvia Else <sylvia(a)not.at.this.address> wrote: >Richard Rasker wrote: >> Sylvia Else wrote: >> >>> Jamie wrote: >>>> Gut into a discussion the other day about the use of >>>> bipolar transistors. >>>> >>>> I told them I was >>>> negatively biased on PNPs >>>> >>>> >>> What's your current opinion on that? >>> >>> Sylvia. >> >> I think this is all a bit emotionally charged. > >Only for people working outside their field. Like a farmer helping out his neighbor?
From: Tim Williams on 6 Dec 2009 13:32 "John Fields" <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> wrote in message news:lplnh5tmes8hsudd05lopcgreae0t9g8tb(a)4ax.com... >>>>>>> I told them I was >>>>>>> negatively biased on PNPs >>>>>> >>>>>> What's your current opinion on that? >>>>> >>>>> I think this is all a bit emotionally charged. >>>> >>>> Only for people working outside their field. >>> >>>Hm, perhaps it's my shielded upbringing, but I fail to see the >>>connection. >>>Or are we talking about isolated cases here? >> >>I think all that talk is full of holes. > > What a dope! Kid, you're wasting your potential. Tim -- Deep Friar: a very philosophical monk. Website: http://webpages.charter.net/dawill/tmoranwms
From: Joerg on 6 Dec 2009 17:09 John Fields wrote: > On Sun, 06 Dec 2009 13:23:46 GMT, Jan Panteltje > <pNaonStpealmtje(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >> On a sunny day (Sun, 06 Dec 2009 14:16:52 +0100) it happened Richard Rasker >> <spamtrap(a)linetec.nl> wrote in >> <4b1baec4$0$730$7ade8c0d(a)textreader.nntp.internl.net>: >> >>> Sylvia Else wrote: >>> >>>> Richard Rasker wrote: >>>>> Sylvia Else wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Jamie wrote: >>>>>>> Gut into a discussion the other day about the use of >>>>>>> bipolar transistors. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I told them I was >>>>>>> negatively biased on PNPs >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> What's your current opinion on that? >>>>>> >>>>>> Sylvia. >>>>> I think this is all a bit emotionally charged. >>>> Only for people working outside their field. >>>> >>>> Sylvia. >>> Hm, perhaps it's my shielded upbringing, but I fail to see the connection. >>> Or are we talking about isolated cases here? >>> >>> Richard Rasker >> I think all that talk is full of holes. > > --- > What a dope! > Guys, collect yourself and watch that what you emit is based well. If you just let everything out of the gate without stating proper sources it's draining everyone here ... -- SCNR, Joerg http://www.analogconsultants.com/ "gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam. Use another domain or send PM.
From: Richard Rasker on 7 Dec 2009 03:11
Joerg wrote: > John Fields wrote: >> On Sun, 06 Dec 2009 13:23:46 GMT, Jan Panteltje >> <pNaonStpealmtje(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> >>> On a sunny day (Sun, 06 Dec 2009 14:16:52 +0100) it happened Richard >>> Rasker <spamtrap(a)linetec.nl> wrote in >>> <4b1baec4$0$730$7ade8c0d(a)textreader.nntp.internl.net>: >>> >>>> Sylvia Else wrote: >>>> >>>>> Richard Rasker wrote: >>>>>> Sylvia Else wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Jamie wrote: >>>>>>>> Gut into a discussion the other day about the use of >>>>>>>> bipolar transistors. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I told them I was >>>>>>>> negatively biased on PNPs >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> What's your current opinion on that? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sylvia. >>>>>> I think this is all a bit emotionally charged. >>>>> Only for people working outside their field. >>>>> >>>>> Sylvia. >>>> Hm, perhaps it's my shielded upbringing, but I fail to see the >>>> connection. Or are we talking about isolated cases here? >>>> >>>> Richard Rasker >>> I think all that talk is full of holes. >> >> --- >> What a dope! >> > > Guys, collect yourself and watch that what you emit is based well. If > you just let everything out of the gate without stating proper sources > it's draining everyone here ... Admittedly, we're lacking a common ground, the signal-to-noise ratio isn't very good, and I much prefer solid arguments over the vapour deposition taking place here, but that's still no reason for your baseless accusations. Richard Rasker -- http://www.linetec.nl |