Prev: point particle vs particle with structure
Next: Egyptians' Spacetime EXACTLY like today's Science
From: Jacko on 19 Jul 2010 10:30 On 19 July, 15:09, Jacko <jackokr...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > FORMS? Anti-(diamagnetic/dielectric) communication/signalling would > improve 'optical' computer performance if a way could be found. Or > maybe good old silicon coated in 'orbistil'? > > What would the necessary chemistry of orbistil be? Mu(sub r) has units s^2/m^2 or (1/velocity) squared. Tiny mu => large c. Minmal mu(0) is cosidered to be the permeability of free space. Is it actually possible to make a lower mu?
From: Frederick Williams on 19 Jul 2010 10:47 BURT wrote: > > How much does the center of a black hole weigh if there is infinite > gravity strength there? The weight of the centre of a black hole is the same as the weight of the centre of a bag of sugar or anything else, viz nothing. -- I can't go on, I'll go on.
From: BURT on 19 Jul 2010 21:42 On Jul 19, 7:47 am, Frederick Williams <frederick.willia...(a)tesco.net> wrote: > BURT wrote: > > > How much does the center of a black hole weigh if there is infinite > > gravity strength there? > > The weight of the centre of a black hole is the same as the weight of > the centre of a bag of sugar or anything else, viz nothing. > > -- > I can't go on, I'll go on. Energy still in gravity will have weight. But a singularity would make any energy infinite in it. Mitch Raemsch
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 Prev: point particle vs particle with structure Next: Egyptians' Spacetime EXACTLY like today's Science |