Prev: Preferred Frame Theory supported by Hafele-Keating experiment
Next: Tony Haydon at Princeton: no comment!
From: BURT on 19 Jul 2010 01:45
How much does the center of a black hole weigh if there is infinite
gravity strength there?

Mitch Raemsch
From: Jacko on 19 Jul 2010 09:40
On 19 July, 06:45, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> How much does the center of a black hole weigh if there is infinite
> gravity strength there?
>
> Mitch Raemsch

Density not strength. Strength is a field property, and the field is
related to the density, but is not the density. Field 'strength' is
usually measured as a radial differential of the sphere suface
containing the density, in quite simple terms.

The question of if the inside of a black hole weights anything from
both an inside and an outside prespective is debatable, it has not
been shown that the matter outside has just dilated outside short of
entry, and so the mass composition could be external to the
signularity. The internal energy density is for sure high, but exactly
how this expanded space or tiny but very slow space 'experiences' and
presents mass, to outside, itself and to indide is unknown as far as I
know.

No one has ever 'proved' matter causes spacewarp, just that all
spacewarp is associated with an accumulation of matter. If matter is
rare, then EM is responsable for keeping the entropy limit in the
favour of mass bounles instead of distributed amongst the dark matter.
Dark flow is due to outside our hole, weighing in. Dark energy the no
mass effect of unbound dark matter.
From: Jacko on 19 Jul 2010 09:55
Have you ever wondered about anti-dimagnetic warp travel?
From: Jacko on 19 Jul 2010 10:09
FORMS? Anti-(diamagnetic/dielectric) communication/signalling would
improve 'optical' computer performance if a way could be found. Or
maybe good old silicon coated in 'orbistil'?

What would the necessary chemistry of orbistil be?
From: Jacko on 19 Jul 2010 10:19
On 19 July, 14:55, Jacko <jackokr...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Have you ever wondered about anti-dimagnetic warp travel?

I think the limit is disk shaped. Consider that the length will dilate
along the axis of travel, therefore maybe a long rod shape is better,
allowing less dilation need for distance and convlves less with
'incident' matter.
 |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2
Prev: Preferred Frame Theory supported by Hafele-Keating experiment
Next: Tony Haydon at Princeton: no comment!