From: Michael Moroney on
BURT <macromitch(a)yahoo.com> writes:

>On Mar 1, 2:32 pm, moro...(a)world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
>wrote:
>> BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> writes:

>> >We cannot collect a positron to accelerate if it cannot make it
>> >through the atmosphere.
>>
>> So we accelerate ones found right here on earth. That yummy banana
>> over there is shooting off a few of them right now!

>What force is required to liberate atomic protons from their neuclear
>shells?

I thought we were talking about positrons, or antimatter in general, not
protons.
From: BURT on
On Mar 1, 2:46 pm, moro...(a)world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
wrote:
> BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> writes:
> >On Mar 1, 2:32 pm, moro...(a)world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
> >wrote:
> >> BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> writes:
> >> >We cannot collect a positron to accelerate if it cannot make it
> >> >through the atmosphere.
>
> >> So we accelerate ones found right here on earth.  That yummy banana
> >> over there is shooting off a few of them right now!
> >What force is required to liberate atomic protons from their neuclear
> >shells?
>
> I thought we were talking about positrons, or antimatter in general, not
> protons.

It is still a legitimate question. What is the proton source?

Liberating protons is a tricky bussiness. It happens in an atomic or
high energy explosions.

Mitch Raemsch

From: Michael Moroney on
BURT <macromitch(a)yahoo.com> writes:

>On Mar 1, 2:46 pm, moro...(a)world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
>wrote:
>> BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> writes:
>> >What force is required to liberate atomic protons from their neuclear
>> >shells?
>>
>> I thought we were talking about positrons, or antimatter in general, not
>> protons.

>It is still a legitimate question. What is the proton source?

>Liberating protons is a tricky bussiness. It happens in an atomic or
>high energy explosions.

Why are you changing the subject? We're discussing positrons and other
forms of antimatter. (Don't get too near that banana! It might just shoot
a positron right at your face!)

If you want to discuss the unrelated topic of releasing protons from
nuclei, start a new topic.
From: Inertial on

"Michael Moroney" <moroney(a)world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
news:hmhhr3$ad2$1(a)pcls4.std.com...
> BURT <macromitch(a)yahoo.com> writes:
>
>>On Mar 1, 2:46 pm, moro...(a)world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
>>wrote:
>>> BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> writes:
>>> >What force is required to liberate atomic protons from their neuclear
>>> >shells?
>>>
>>> I thought we were talking about positrons, or antimatter in general, not
>>> protons.
>
>>It is still a legitimate question. What is the proton source?
>
>>Liberating protons is a tricky bussiness. It happens in an atomic or
>>high energy explosions.
>
> Why are you changing the subject? We're discussing positrons and other
> forms of antimatter. (Don't get too near that banana! It might just shoot
> a positron right at your face!)
>
> If you want to discuss the unrelated topic of releasing protons from
> nuclei, start a new topic.

BURT (mitch) is a troll who posts random phrases in response to just about
every thread .. sometimes just posting random threads with his nonsense in
it. His replies are rarely on topic. I think he may be a software program
and not a real person (with only an occasional real-person reply if he feels
the need). Best just to ignore him as unwanted noise.


From: Inertial on

"Inertial" <relatively(a)rest.com> wrote in message
news:4b8c50b1$1$8837$c3e8da3(a)news.astraweb.com...
>
> "Michael Moroney" <moroney(a)world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
> news:hmhhr3$ad2$1(a)pcls4.std.com...
>> BURT <macromitch(a)yahoo.com> writes:
>>
>>>On Mar 1, 2:46 pm, moro...(a)world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
>>>wrote:
>>>> BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> writes:
>>>> >What force is required to liberate atomic protons from their neuclear
>>>> >shells?
>>>>
>>>> I thought we were talking about positrons, or antimatter in general,
>>>> not
>>>> protons.
>>
>>>It is still a legitimate question. What is the proton source?
>>
>>>Liberating protons is a tricky bussiness. It happens in an atomic or
>>>high energy explosions.
>>
>> Why are you changing the subject? We're discussing positrons and other
>> forms of antimatter. (Don't get too near that banana! It might just
>> shoot
>> a positron right at your face!)
>>
>> If you want to discuss the unrelated topic of releasing protons from
>> nuclei, start a new topic.
>
> BURT (mitch) is a troll who posts random phrases in response to just about
> every thread .. sometimes just posting random threads with his nonsense in
> it. His replies are rarely on topic. I think he may be a software
> program and not a real person (with only an occasional real-person reply
> if he feels the need). Best just to ignore him as unwanted noise.

BTW: AS evidence .. look at the series of replies to himself in the 'Slowing
aether rates' .. I've removed a couple of amusing interjections from waldofj
which were ignored

===
On Mar 1, 3:51 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> > On Feb 28, 5:10 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > On Feb 28, 2:06 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > > On Feb 27, 9:34 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > > > Two times slow down. Once can be slower than the other. They come
> > > > > togther as one flow over flowing energy.
> > > > > Mitch Raemsch
> > > > Falling as in drop is being pushed into a slower aether flow over
> > > > energy. There are two times.
> > > > Mitch Raemsch
> > > Increasing flow of energy through space and the gravity strength set
> > > up the two times that come together mathematically and flow over
> > > energy.
> > > Mitch Raemsch
> There are two aether rates to slow. Gravity time is primary followed
> by energy flow through space time.
> Mitch Raemsch
===

These same nonsense phrases are posted in other threads every so often.


First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Prev: Moving behind light
Next: Falling at a black hole