There is no physical length contraction or physical length expansion
in [Physics]
|
From: spudnik on 12 Jul 2010 15:37 you've stated that, before, and you didn't read my question ... so much for the New sciencE! >I've DISPROVED SR and GR. 'c' isn't the maximum velocity! > > why is that so hard to see? thus&so: hey, I lost track of the 3ad, wherein you were said -- in the second person -- to have refuted Galilean relativity; so, what did you really do to it -- how about those 3d glasses? [-- If you just took them off, leave them off for n seconds; if you just put them back on, leave them on for n hours. thank *you*, and n=n, quads erat demonstrandae .--] > Your Einstein biased status quo "spin" form the Department > of Einsteinmania, The Musical Dept {the first album}. thus&so: I *did* focus upon WTC7, but does the numbering infer that it was the seventh bild. to be built?... I think, not. > Focus on WTC7. It accelerated at free fall with near perfect symmetry. > ... "the height of ignorance." --Albert Einstein. thus&so: if it's any consolation, I get the next-to-last word on it; I'd rather wear a pseudorandom pair of Imelda Marcos's shoes, then try to debate in the context of your New sciencE -- just think of all of the permutations, dood. thus&so: that is sufficiently all, to be said on Benford's God-am law; can we not necessarily use e? (not "sumorial, although I know that there is a 'real' analog of the factorial, dood?") > >> "Generalization to digits beyond the first". > For base-b, the probability of d being the n-th digit > (n > 1) is: > b^{n-1}-1 > --- 1 > > log ( 1 + ------ ) > --- b bk + d > k=b^{n-2} > > that the probability of the first > digit being d is: > 1 > log ( 1 + - ) > b d thus&so: sorry; I'm going to stop saying, thence he died, and abuzing my time with this monolog. thanks for all fish! I'm just saying, go jumpt into a pool of spacetime, or timespace, as long as it's deep! > read more »... thus&so: yeah, but are the glasses, 3d, or the clocks -- or neither or both? > ... so, I said, "Hey, Einstein, space and time are made of rubber! > "Just kidding, dood." > I am, however, not implying that he was a surfer, but > he did know the canonical surfer's value ... of pi. thus&so: it's just his bot, as far as I can tell, without researching it ... googoling would be way too much positive feedback, and that's unpositively moderate anyway, what difference between lightwaves and rocks o'light, vis-a-vu the curvature of space (as was uncovered by You now who & you know whO-oo, in the 18th and BCE centuries (or 2nd and Minus Oneth millenia ?-) also, don't forget the ... well, their are a few of them! > If colleagues know, what good? thus&so: .... time, considered to be perpendicular to all of the three spatial directions; at least, in some abstract sense. anyway, I invented the terminology; so ,there.... um, perpendicular Universes: --BP's cap™ call of brokers the group! association http://tarpley.net
From: spudnik on 12 Jul 2010 15:43
so, you've never proven a theorem in geometry?... OK, let me mark that down in my notebook: subject displays periods of typing. Wordperfect (TM) ?? see, that's what is known as "research;" dyscuss that, and also "'c' isn't the maximum velocity of rocks o'light, even if it is for waves of it; so, there." > limit yourself to two paragraphs? I've redefined the mechanisms thus&so: I've DISPROVED SR and GR. 'c' isn't the maximum velocity! > why is that so hard to see? thus&so: hey, I lost track of the 3ad, wherein you were said -- in the second person -- to have refuted Galilean relativity; so, what did you really do to it -- how about those 3d glasses? [-- If you just took them off, leave them off for n seconds; if you just put them back on, leave them on for n hours. thank *you*, and n=n, quads erat demonstrandae .--] > Your Einstein biased status quo "spin" form the Department > of Einsteinmania, The Musical Dept {the first album}. thus&so: I *did* focus upon WTC7, but does the numbering infer that it was the seventh bild. to be built?... I think, not. > Focus on WTC7. It accelerated at free fall with near perfect symmetry. > ... "the height of ignorance." --Albert Einstein. thus&so: if it's any consolation, I get the next-to-last word on it; I'd rather wear a pseudorandom pair of Imelda Marcos's shoes, then try to debate in the context of your New sciencE -- just think of all of the permutations, dood. thus&so: that is sufficiently all, to be said on Benford's God-am law; can we not necessarily use e? (not "sumorial, although I know that there is a 'real' analog of the factorial, dood?") > >> "Generalization to digits beyond the first". > For base-b, the probability of d being the n-th digit > (n > 1) is: > b^{n-1}-1 > --- 1 > > log ( 1 + ------ ) > --- b bk + d > k=b^{n-2} > > that the probability of the first > digit being d is: > 1 > log ( 1 + - ) > b d thus&so: sorry; I'm going to stop saying, thence he died, and abuzing my time with this monolog. thanks for all fish! I'm just saying, go jumpt into a pool of spacetime, or timespace, as long as it's deep! > read more »... thus&so: yeah, but are the glasses, 3d, or the clocks -- or neither or both? > ... so, I said, "Hey, Einstein, space and time are made of rubber! > "Just kidding, dood." > I am, however, not implying that he was a surfer, but > he did know the canonical surfer's value ... of pi. thus&so: it's just his bot, as far as I can tell, without researching it ... googoling would be way too much positive feedback, and that's unpositively moderate anyway, what difference between lightwaves and rocks o'light, vis-a-vu the curvature of space (as was uncovered by You now who & you know whO-oo, in the 18th and BCE centuries (or 2nd and Minus Oneth millenia ?-) also, don't forget the ... well, their are a few of them! > If colleagues know, what good? thus&so: .... time, considered to be perpendicular to all of the three spatial directions; at least, in some abstract sense. anyway, I invented the terminology; so ,there.... um, perpendicular Universes: --BP's cap™ call of brokers the group! association http://tarpley.net |