Prev: Daffodils
Next: applying Goldbach proof format to FLT and Riemann Hypothesis #683: Correcting Math
From: Amy on 15 Jul 2010 14:10

"JSH" <jstevh(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:c5fff4e9-a613-45e3-9b87-8fd94f04f11b(a)x18g2000pro.googlegroups.com...
>

> And who cares really?

> Do they feel sorry for them?

> What?

> Will anyone really care? Probably not.

> It can get boring but I think practice is a good thing.
>
>
> James Harris


another JSH poop into sci.math.
Worthless attempts to boost ego.


From: Jesse F. Hughes on 15 Jul 2010 14:41
"Amy" <nospam(a)spamless.com> writes:

> "JSH" <jstevh(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:c5fff4e9-a613-45e3-9b87-8fd94f04f11b(a)x18g2000pro.googlegroups.com...
>>
>
>> And who cares really?
>
>> Do they feel sorry for them?
>
>> What?
>
>> Will anyone really care? Probably not.
>
>> It can get boring but I think practice is a good thing.
>>
>>
>> James Harris
>
>
> another JSH poop into sci.math.
> Worthless attempts to boost ego.

How would you characterize your own "contributions"?


--
"I've been thinking about my problems with getting any kind of
admission that my math arguments showing the core error in mathematics
are correct, so I've gone to marketing books."
-- James S. Harris, on when mathematics isn't enough
From: Chum Ley on 15 Jul 2010 16:16

"Jesse F. Hughes" <jesse(a)phiwumbda.org> wrote in message
news:871vb4twoh.fsf(a)phiwumbda.org...
> "Amy" <nospam(a)spamless.com> writes:
>
>> "JSH" <jstevh(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:c5fff4e9-a613-45e3-9b87-8fd94f04f11b(a)x18g2000pro.googlegroups.com...
>>>
>>
>>> And who cares really?
>>
>>> Do they feel sorry for them?
>>
>>> What?
>>
>>> Will anyone really care? Probably not.
>>
>>> It can get boring but I think practice is a good thing.
>>>
>>>
>>> James Harris
>>
>>
>> another JSH poop into sci.math.
>> Worthless attempts to boost ego.
>
> How would you characterize your own "contributions"?
>

Math Critic - is not someone who simply "criticizes," but a person who
studies, analyzes, and then renders a rational judgment of what he/she has
seen.
You may, of course, disagree with me, but this post by JSH is self promoting
poop (SPP).


From: Amy on 15 Jul 2010 16:19

"Jesse F. Hughes" <jesse(a)phiwumbda.org> wrote in message
news:871vb4twoh.fsf(a)phiwumbda.org...
> "Amy" <nospam(a)spamless.com> writes:
>
>> "JSH" <jstevh(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:c5fff4e9-a613-45e3-9b87-8fd94f04f11b(a)x18g2000pro.googlegroups.com...
>>>
>>
>>> And who cares really?
>>
>>> Do they feel sorry for them?
>>
>>> What?
>>
>>> Will anyone really care? Probably not.
>>
>>> It can get boring but I think practice is a good thing.
>>>
>>>
>>> James Harris
>>
>>
>> another JSH poop into sci.math.
>> Worthless attempts to boost ego.
>
> How would you characterize your own "contributions"?
>
>

I review math books before press


From: Jesse F. Hughes on 15 Jul 2010 16:57
"Amy" <nospam(a)spamless.com> writes:

> "Jesse F. Hughes" <jesse(a)phiwumbda.org> wrote in message
> news:871vb4twoh.fsf(a)phiwumbda.org...
>> "Amy" <nospam(a)spamless.com> writes:
>>
>>> "JSH" <jstevh(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:c5fff4e9-a613-45e3-9b87-8fd94f04f11b(a)x18g2000pro.googlegroups.com...
>>>>
>>>
>>>> And who cares really?
>>>
>>>> Do they feel sorry for them?
>>>
>>>> What?
>>>
>>>> Will anyone really care? Probably not.
>>>
>>>> It can get boring but I think practice is a good thing.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> James Harris
>>>
>>>
>>> another JSH poop into sci.math.
>>> Worthless attempts to boost ego.
>>
>> How would you characterize your own "contributions"?
>>
>>
>
> I review math books before press

I was referring to your sci.math contributions.

But thanks for an example of a worthless attempt to boost ego.

--
"The papers are currently at journals. [When published,] make no
mistake, there will be no place on this planet where you can hide.
Remember, I'm not talking about something vague here. I'm talking
about publication in journals." James S. Harris. Wow. Journals.
 |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2
Prev: Daffodils
Next: applying Goldbach proof format to FLT and Riemann Hypothesis #683: Correcting Math