Prev: system table/view and sequence
Next: [HACKERS] Default libpq application name
From: Alvaro Herrera on 22 Apr 2010 17:14
Tom Lane escribi�:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(a)gmail.com> writes:
> > On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 7:13 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(a)sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> >> (You might want to look back at the archived discussions about how to
> >> avoid storing entries for temp tables in these catalogs; that poses
> >> many of the same issues.)
>
> > Do you happen to know what a good search term might be? I tried
> > searching for things like "pg_class temp tables" and "pg_class
> > temporary tables" and didn't come up with much.
>
> I found this thread:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-07/msg00593.php
> I claimed in that message that there were previous discussions but
> I did not come across them right away.

I vaguely remember that there was a discussion about pg_attribute and
the extra rows for system rows for all tables, which diverged into a
discussion about temp tables and those other extra rows.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Prev: system table/view and sequence
Next: [HACKERS] Default libpq application name