Tiller's "Intention Imprinting" Device?
in [Design]
|
From: Greegor on 30 May 2010 13:46 Winston, It appears you were correct! LOL from Greg Hanson <greegor47(a)gmail.com> to bill(a)tiller.org date Fri, May 28, 2010 at 11:35 PM subject UED Schematic and parts list? mailed-by gmail.com William A. Tiller Foundation For New Science Dr.William A.Tiller, et alia: Some associates of mine have taken an interest in your document entitled: "Steps for Moving Psychoenergetics Science Research Into the Hands of Interested General Public Researchers". This paper is at: http://tillerfoundation.com/White%20Paper%20II.pdf Figure 1 on page 3 is 2 electronic schematic diagrams of devices you named UED or unimprinted electrical device for Intention-Host Device Research. The schematic is blurry and unclear in critical areas. This is unusual for PDF documents. Do you have a better digital copy of the schematics, and a parts list available online to the general public? Greg Hanson Greegor47(a)gmail.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- from Bill Tiller <jgfandel(a)npgcable.com> to Greg Hanson <greegor47(a)gmail.com> date Sat, May 29, 2010 at 1:21 PM subject Re: UED Schematic and parts list? mailed-by npgcable.com Dear Greg: We realize that your request arises from the perfectly understandable desire to understand how the UED works from a conventional electrical engineering point of view. We have received numerous similar requests in the past. We have honored such requests, in the past, sent a more readable (?) schematic circuit diagram and the result is always the same. So, we can save you some trouble by revealing what everyone who has pursued this path has concluded. In a nutshell, "This device cannot possibly do anything, whatsoever, from a conventional electrical perspective". The point is that the device does not operate on that level of physical reality. To better understand this, re-read White Paper I; and, when you are ready, some of the other White Papers. The circuit diagram for the R-space part of the coupled system is what you are really after. The R-space parts list is the only parts list that is really important to us. Sincerely, Walter Dibble, Ph.D. The William A. Tiller Institute ----------------------------------------------------------------------- from Greg Hanson <greegor47(a)gmail.com> to Bill Tiller <jgfandel(a)npgcable.com> date Sat, May 29, 2010 at 6:16 PM subject UED Schematic and parts list? mailed-by gmail.com Dr. Dibble: Has anybody reproduced your statistical results? Have these papers passed peer review? Are you saying that the device and results presented cannot be independently reproduced? How could I do an authentic recreation of your results without more precise specs on the parts? Greg Hanson ------------------------------------------------------------------- from Bill Tiller <jgfandel(a)npgcable.com> to Greg Hanson <greegor47(a)gmail.com> date Sat, May 29, 2010 at 7:17 PM subject Re: UED Schematic and parts list? mailed-by npgcable.com Dear Greg: Please clarify what your replication effort would consist of. When you talk of results, be a little bit more specific. What results do you mean? You can always buy one of the UEDs, reverse engineer it to your heart's content and then use it any way you want to or build your own. Sincerely, Walter Dibble, Ph.D. The William A. Tiller Institute ------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Don Lancaster on 30 May 2010 16:26 On 5/29/2010 2:42 PM, Greegor wrote: > h> If anyone has actually read the text, is there > h> any code in the EEPROM or just blank (all FFs) ? > > W> Doesn't matter. Ideally one would start with all > W> FFs, though 8K of garbage data is not > W> qualitatively different from any other 8K of garbage data. > > h> The OSC symbols are kind of wrong, they look like crystals or > resonators. > > > W> Yes. In the 'multiple oscillator' version, they are not even > powered. :) > > Isn't that particular oversight almost a convention for some > designers? > > > > Has this Intention Imprinting experiment been > written up in The Journal of Irreproducible Results? > > http://www.jir.com/ One of the curious results of early CMOS circuits: If you forgot to power them, they still worked, sort of, except slower. Protection diodes off the inputs sometimes would provide enough supply power to at least get some results. -- Many thanks, Don Lancaster voice phone: (928)428-4073 Synergetics 3860 West First Street Box 809 Thatcher, AZ 85552 rss: http://www.tinaja.com/whtnu.xml email: don(a)tinaja.com Please visit my GURU's LAIR web site at http://www.tinaja.com
|
Pages: 1 Prev: Static sensitivity and the PIC MCLR pin Next: Tiller's "Intention Imprinting" Device? |