Tiller's "Intention Imprinting" Device?
in [Design]
|
From: Bob Gerber on 31 May 2010 01:47 On Sun, 30 May 2010 17:01:27 -0700 (PDT), Greegor <greegor47(a)gmail.com> wrote: >We realize that your request arises from the perfectly understandable >desire to understand how the UED works from a conventional electrical >engineering point of view. We have received numerous similar requests >in the past. We have honored such requests, in the past, sent a more >readable (?) schematic circuit diagram and the result is always the >same. So, we can save you some trouble by revealing what everyone who >has pursued this path has concluded. In a nutshell, "This device >cannot possibly do anything, whatsoever, from a conventional >electrical perspective". > Strange then the paper should be titled, "Steps for Moving Psychoenergetics Science Research Into the Hands of Interested General Public Researchers". If any member of the "public" here actually gets the circuit up and running, I hope they will post a diagram to this group and show Dr. Dibble et al that we are "interested" enough to be taken seriously. Bob Gerber
From: Don Lancaster on 31 May 2010 11:30 On 5/30/2010 10:47 PM, Bob Gerber wrote: > On Sun, 30 May 2010 17:01:27 -0700 (PDT), Greegor > <greegor47(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> We realize that your request arises from the perfectly understandable >> desire to understand how the UED works from a conventional electrical >> engineering point of view. We have received numerous similar requests >> in the past. We have honored such requests, in the past, sent a more >> readable (?) schematic circuit diagram and the result is always the >> same. So, we can save you some trouble by revealing what everyone who >> has pursued this path has concluded. In a nutshell, "This device >> cannot possibly do anything, whatsoever, from a conventional >> electrical perspective". >> > > Strange then the paper should be titled, "Steps for Moving > Psychoenergetics Science Research Into the Hands of Interested General > Public Researchers". > > If any member of the "public" here actually gets the circuit up and > running, I hope they will post a diagram to this group and show Dr. > Dibble et al that we are "interested" enough to be taken seriously. > > Bob Gerber There's a million dollar reward for the circuit working. http://www.randi.org> -- Many thanks, Don Lancaster voice phone: (928)428-4073 Synergetics 3860 West First Street Box 809 Thatcher, AZ 85552 rss: http://www.tinaja.com/whtnu.xml email: don(a)tinaja.com Please visit my GURU's LAIR web site at http://www.tinaja.com
From: Winston on 31 May 2010 14:26 On 5/31/2010 8:30 AM, Don Lancaster wrote: (...) > There's a million dollar reward for the circuit working. > > http://www.randi.org> Don, any reasonably competent tech should be able to make that circuit fulfill it's electronic engineering design goal. Filling a RAM or EEPROM with random garbage bytes is not that difficult. :) I suspect that you meant the 'Woo Woo' aspect of the experiment where exposure to the 'imprinted' device causes the water in a plastic bottle to absorb a bit of CO2 and become a tiny bit more acidic, where exposure to an 'unimprinted' device leaves the water pH unaffected. I am sure Mr. Randi would be pleased to have a look at the setup (and Dr. Bob and Dr. Walt as well!) --Winston
From: Greegor on 31 May 2010 15:00
"Steps for Moving Psychoenergetics Science Research Into the Hands of Interested General Public Researchers". Bob: That title is indeed something to meditate about! |