From: isw on
In article <4MLkn.10889$0w4.2497(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>,
Lewis <notmyemail(a)example.com> wrote:

> On 06-Mar-10 23:57, isw wrote:
> > I used to use Retrospect (in the ancient days of OS 8 and 9), and even
> > on 100 MHz Macs, it never ever caused poor performance.
>
> Disks were much smaller and you were moving far less data and it was
> being copied much slower.

Yes, and that is precisely how I think T-M should behave.

Isaac
From: isw on
In article <tom_stiller-7FEA61.06424407032010(a)news.individual.net>,
Tom Stiller <tom_stiller(a)yahoo.com> wrote:

> In article <4b933105$0$22130$742ec2ed(a)news.sonic.net>,
> Kevin McMurtrie <mcmurtrie(a)pixelmemory.us> wrote:
>
> > In article <sdfisher-2E6BCB.20002006032010(a)mara100-84.onlink.net>,
> > Steven Fisher <sdfisher(a)spamcop.net> wrote:
> >
> > > In article <isw-68661E.11501105032010@[216.168.3.50]>,
> > > isw <isw(a)witzend.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > When I'm doing something like photo editing that takes a lot of
> > > > processing, and Time Machine kicks in, things get more than a little
> > > > sluggish on my 1.8GHz Core Duo MacBook.
> > >
> > > backupd peaks at about 6% of my MacBook's CPU. Yours is not that much
> > > older than mine, so I don't see why would be much worse.
> > >
> > > What temperature is your MacBook running at? If it gets too hot, your
> > > computer will get throttled down automatically. This causes the
> > > sluggishness you describe.
> > >
> > >
> > > Steve
> >
> > It's not a matter of CPU consumption. Time Machine keeps the source and
> > destination volumes saturated. Many system operations access the
> > startup disk or query all mounted volumes for status, and that is what
> > causes everything to slow down during a backup. An extreme case can be
> > seen when backing up to a remote volume over the internet - all apps
> > stutter or flash the spinning beachball.
>
> I use a TimeCapsule for backups and rarely see a hiccup even while
> watching a full screen HDTV program on my 24" iMac.

What's the data rate across your LAN to the TimeCapsule?

Isaac
From: Tom Stiller on
In article <isw-B228F5.20331907032010@[216.168.3.50]>,
isw <isw(a)witzend.com> wrote:

> In article <tom_stiller-7FEA61.06424407032010(a)news.individual.net>,
> Tom Stiller <tom_stiller(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > In article <4b933105$0$22130$742ec2ed(a)news.sonic.net>,
> > Kevin McMurtrie <mcmurtrie(a)pixelmemory.us> wrote:
> >
> > > In article <sdfisher-2E6BCB.20002006032010(a)mara100-84.onlink.net>,
> > > Steven Fisher <sdfisher(a)spamcop.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > > In article <isw-68661E.11501105032010@[216.168.3.50]>,
> > > > isw <isw(a)witzend.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > When I'm doing something like photo editing that takes a lot of
> > > > > processing, and Time Machine kicks in, things get more than a little
> > > > > sluggish on my 1.8GHz Core Duo MacBook.
> > > >
> > > > backupd peaks at about 6% of my MacBook's CPU. Yours is not that much
> > > > older than mine, so I don't see why would be much worse.
> > > >
> > > > What temperature is your MacBook running at? If it gets too hot, your
> > > > computer will get throttled down automatically. This causes the
> > > > sluggishness you describe.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Steve
> > >
> > > It's not a matter of CPU consumption. Time Machine keeps the source and
> > > destination volumes saturated. Many system operations access the
> > > startup disk or query all mounted volumes for status, and that is what
> > > causes everything to slow down during a backup. An extreme case can be
> > > seen when backing up to a remote volume over the internet - all apps
> > > stutter or flash the spinning beachball.
> >
> > I use a TimeCapsule for backups and rarely see a hiccup even while
> > watching a full screen HDTV program on my 24" iMac.
>
> What's the data rate across your LAN to the TimeCapsule?
>
> Isaac

1 GB/Sec (1000baseT <full-duplex,flow-control> none). File transfers
can achieve several hundred MB/sec while TM backups rarely exceed a few
tens of MB/sec. HD Video is delivered over the same interface at about
16 MB/sec/channel (I have two channels in).

--
Tom Stiller

PGP fingerprint = 5108 DDB2 9761 EDE5 E7E3 7BDA 71ED 6496 99C0 C7CF
From: Tom Stiller on
In article <slrnhp9sv7.1mbj.g.kreme(a)cerebus.local>,
Lewis <g.kreme(a)gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> wrote:

> In message <tom_stiller-3EAEB0.07142508032010(a)news.individual.net> Tom
> <tom_stiller(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >1 GB/Sec (1000baseT <full-duplex,flow-control> none). File transfers
> >can achieve several hundred MB/sec while TM backups rarely exceed a few
> >tens of MB/sec. HD Video is delivered over the same interface at about
> >16 MB/sec/channel (I have two channels in).
>
> You are confusing B (bytes) with b (bits). A decently fast SATA RAID
> will be able to write about 30-45MB/s, which is 250-350Mb/s

I was 't confused, just senior moment-ed ;-) You are correct; the "B"s
should be "b"s. The numbers are correct.

--
Tom Stiller

PGP fingerprint = 5108 DDB2 9761 EDE5 E7E3 7BDA 71ED 6496 99C0 C7CF
From: isw on
In article <tom_stiller-3EAEB0.07142508032010(a)news.individual.net>,
Tom Stiller <tom_stiller(a)yahoo.com> wrote:

--snippage--

> > What's the data rate across your LAN to the TimeCapsule?
> >
> > Isaac
>
> 1 GB/Sec (1000baseT <full-duplex,flow-control> none). File transfers
> can achieve several hundred MB/sec while TM backups rarely exceed a few
> tens of MB/sec. HD Video is delivered over the same interface at about
> 16 MB/sec/channel (I have two channels in).

Interesting. This thread has put me in mind of finding an old USB 1.1
hub that I know is around here somewhere, and hooking up the T-M disc
through it, to see if throttling the data rate will help my problem.

I didn't mention this before, but I think part of the issue is GIMP,
which is a huge resource hog all by itself, and not helped because of
its X11 underpinnings. Then, the images I'm editing are scans of 35mm
slides that clock in at around 350-400 MB each when being worked on.
Then when T-M starts up, things really bog down.

I'm about 90% through my lifetime slide collection, with only about 400
left to edit...

Isaac