To "paparios"....was: Re: Experts doubt Einstein..... but EinsteinDingleberries still worship him
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Einsteinians refuse to face hard facts relating to sound methodand deductive logic
Next: Azimuthally symmetric theory of gravitation
From: Me, ...again! on 16 Jun 2010 22:44 Earlier this evening I went to that URL you gave below, did a copy to my HD and will have a more detailed look later. Its a translation of a quite old paper (1918), which seems early in the overall "debating" that had gone on for decades (or whatever). I did skim over it once, but need to just read slowly once and get the gist. I think I'll look at that Einstein book (maybe it is a reprint of much earlier work, and less worth it to me because of that), but I'd wish more for a fairly good, recent overview _review_ paper or chapter that covers the scrutiny that E/R got over all the decades, including the experimental work and experiment design. ////////////////////// On Tue, 15 Jun 2010, paparios(a)gmail.com wrote: > On 15 jun, 17:29, "Me, ...again!" <arthu...(a)mv.com> wrote: >> On Tue, 15 Jun 2010, papar...(a)gmail.com wrote: > >> >>>> XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX >> >>>> Dialog About Objections Against the Theory of Relativity >>>> by Albert Einstein (Paperback - Nov. 12, 2009) >> >>>> XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX >> >>> What makes you think that book is a "doubter" book? Have you ever read >>> it? >> >> I gather from the title that Einstein, himself, is discussing the >> "objections against the theory of relativity" and it would be important to >> see what he, Einstein, sees as "objections" and how he handles them. >> > > Well, it is clearly not enough to just read the title and then proceed > to get all kind of conclusions, without even try to read the essay who > is everywhere in the internet. > > For instance see > > http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Dialog_about_Objections_against_the_Theory_of_Relativity > > Miguel Rios >
From: Me, ...again! on 17 Jun 2010 08:43
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010, Peter Webb wrote: > > "Me, ...again!" <arthures(a)mv.com> wrote in message > news:Pine.BSF.4.61.1006162238180.2355(a)osmium.mv.net... >> >> Earlier this evening I went to that URL you gave below, did a copy to my HD >> and will have a more detailed look later. Its a translation of a quite >> old paper (1918), which seems early in the overall "debating" that had gone >> on for decades (or whatever). I did skim over it once, but need to just >> read >> slowly once and get the gist. I think I'll look at that Einstein book >> (maybe >> it is a reprint of much earlier work, and less worth it to me because of >> that), but I'd wish more for a fairly good, recent overview _review_ paper >> or chapter that covers the scrutiny that E/R got over all the decades, >> including the experimental work and experiment design. >> > > For SR, > http://www.desy.de/user/projects/Physics/Relativity/SR/experiments.html > provides an excellent summary with references to the original papers. > > HTH > > Peter Webb > > I'll have a look later today. Going to be busy for several hours now with higher priority stuff. Thanks. |