From: Patrice on 5 May 2010 08:22 Hi, > I would expect all "normal" work to stop and the only thing to conitnue > working in the service would be the mechanism to listen for a > resume/continue signal. Then it means the service is stopped as it does nothing else rather than waiting to start again. So pausing or stopping the service wouldn't make any difference. Also AFAIK several services such as FTP are done usually this way. It allows to stop servicing new requests and at some point later, to ensure that nobody uses the service. Still someone that started downloading something can download to the end rather than being stuck in the middle (which would happen if you just stop the service)... -- Patrice
From: Jeff Johnson on 5 May 2010 13:59 "Patrice" <http://www.chez.com/scribe/> wrote in message news:%23lJ7Z2E7KHA.3184(a)TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... >> I would expect all "normal" work to stop and the only thing to conitnue >> working in the service would be the mechanism to listen for a >> resume/continue signal. > > Then it means the service is stopped as it does nothing else rather than > waiting to start again. So pausing or stopping the service wouldn't make > any difference. Sure it does! All the service's current state would still be in memory. Do you think that using "Sleep" on your computer is the same as "Shut Down"?
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 Prev: keeping RCW afloat Next: Sending email as HTML - The given path's format is not supported |