Today night the physicists-criminals from CERN accelerated protonsto the record energy 3.5 TeV per beam.
in [Basics]
|
Prev: Today night the physicists-criminals from CERN acceleratedprotons to the record energy 3.5 TeV per beam.
Next: Today night the physicists-criminals from CERN accelerated protons to the record energy 3.5 TeV per beam.
From: Sam Wormley on 19 Mar 2010 14:41 On 3/19/10 3:43 AM, Magnetic wrote: > Today night the physicists-criminals from CERN accelerated protons to > the record energy 3.5 TeV per beam. At the regions of collisions, > probably, the rays were on skew lines (two lines that do not intersect > but are not parallel). It is not excluded that there were accidental > collisions of protons. > The LHC temps are many orders of magnitude below those of the very early universe. Even cosmic rays are 6-12 orders of magnitude greater than the LHC.
From: Nicolas Bonneel on 19 Mar 2010 16:31 WangoTango wrote: > In article <MPG.260d9604645d433c989682(a)reader80.eternal-september.org>, > Wal(a)somewhere.invalid says... >> In article <347753b0-85f2-4025-be1f- >> 47a943c9f16e(a)z4g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>, magnetic.trap(a)yandex.ua >> says... >> [...] >>> If the collapse was switched, then most probably tomorrow morning all >>> people will start to cosmos. >> I don't think "cosmos" is a verb. >> > Besides, if Hawking is correct, miniature black holes are not black, and > would in fact be very hot, and very short lived, as they quantum > evaporate. The universe if full of collisions every second, and 'it' is > still here. and even during its life, the small black-hole can only absorb matter within its Schwarzschild radius. Which is "small" for a "small" backhole. Everything outside is attracted in the same way as if it was not a blackhole. If the blackhole has 100 tons of matter in a very small volume, it would not attract me more than the building next to me which weighs much more (and which basically almost doesn't attract me at all).
From: Sjouke Burry on 19 Mar 2010 19:14 Sam Wormley wrote: > On 3/19/10 3:43 AM, Magnetic wrote: >> Today night the physicists-criminals from CERN accelerated protons to >> the record energy 3.5 TeV per beam. At the regions of collisions, >> probably, the rays were on skew lines (two lines that do not intersect >> but are not parallel). It is not excluded that there were accidental >> collisions of protons. >> > > > The LHC temps are many orders of magnitude below those > of the very early universe. Even cosmic rays are 6-12 > orders of magnitude greater than the LHC. > About a hundred people have tried to confuse M with facts. It does not work. He is like a maniak blind to all arguments and info.
From: Sam Wormley on 19 Mar 2010 20:12
On 3/19/10 3:43 AM, Magnetic wrote: > Today night the physicists-criminals from CERN accelerated protons to > the record energy 3.5 TeV per beam. At the regions of collisions, > probably, the rays were on skew lines (two lines that do not intersect > but are not parallel). It is not excluded that there were accidental > collisions of protons. > At 5:20 a.m., local time, in Geneva, Switzerland, physicists sent two proton beams racing around the Large Hadron Collider's oval-shaped, 17-mile-long (27-kilometer-long) underground tunnel. Each beam packed a powerful 3.5-trillion-electron-volt (TeV) punch�the highest energy yet achieved in a particle accelerator, or atom smasher. (Learn more about atom smashers.) The Large Hadron Collider had also set the previous record. Last December the LHC smashed two 1.18-TeV beams to create a 2.36-TeV collision. |