Today night the physicists-criminals from CERN accelerated protonsto the record energy 3.5 TeV per beam.
in [DSP]
|
Prev: lms-dfe implementation
Next: Today night the physicists-criminals from CERN accelerated protons to the record energy 3.5 TeV per beam.
From: Sam Wormley on 19 Mar 2010 14:41 On 3/19/10 3:43 AM, Magnetic wrote: > Today night the physicists-criminals from CERN accelerated protons to > the record energy 3.5 TeV per beam. At the regions of collisions, > probably, the rays were on skew lines (two lines that do not intersect > but are not parallel). It is not excluded that there were accidental > collisions of protons. > The LHC temps are many orders of magnitude below those of the very early universe. Even cosmic rays are 6-12 orders of magnitude greater than the LHC.
From: Nicolas Bonneel on 19 Mar 2010 16:31 WangoTango wrote: > In article <MPG.260d9604645d433c989682(a)reader80.eternal-september.org>, > Wal(a)somewhere.invalid says... >> In article <347753b0-85f2-4025-be1f- >> 47a943c9f16e(a)z4g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>, magnetic.trap(a)yandex.ua >> says... >> [...] >>> If the collapse was switched, then most probably tomorrow morning all >>> people will start to cosmos. >> I don't think "cosmos" is a verb. >> > Besides, if Hawking is correct, miniature black holes are not black, and > would in fact be very hot, and very short lived, as they quantum > evaporate. The universe if full of collisions every second, and 'it' is > still here. and even during its life, the small black-hole can only absorb matter within its Schwarzschild radius. Which is "small" for a "small" backhole. Everything outside is attracted in the same way as if it was not a blackhole. If the blackhole has 100 tons of matter in a very small volume, it would not attract me more than the building next to me which weighs much more (and which basically almost doesn't attract me at all).
From: Jerry Avins on 19 Mar 2010 16:51 Magnetic wrote: > Today night the physicists-criminals from CERN accelerated protons to > the record energy 3.5 TeV per beam. At the regions of collisions, > probably, the rays were on skew lines (two lines that do not intersect > but are not parallel). It is not excluded that there were accidental > collisions of protons. > > If the collapse was switched, then most probably tomorrow morning all > people will start to cosmos. > > According to plan the first collisions at 3.5 TeV must be fulfilled > the 30-th of March. I offer this one-sided bet to set your mind at ease: if we are still whole after CERN goes operative, You pay me $1. Otherwise, I pay you $1,000. Are you on? Jerry -- Discovery consists of seeing what everybody has seen, and thinking what nobody has thought. .. Albert Szent-Gyorgi �����������������������������������������������������������������������
From: Jerry Avins on 19 Mar 2010 16:54 WangoTango wrote: > ... The universe if full of collisions every second, and 'it' is > still here. How can we be sure? Jerry -- Discovery consists of seeing what everybody has seen, and thinking what nobody has thought. .. Albert Szent-Gyorgi �����������������������������������������������������������������������
From: Uncle Al on 19 Mar 2010 18:50
Jerry Avins wrote: > > WangoTango wrote: > > > ... The universe if full of collisions every second, and 'it' is > > still here. > > How can we be sure? 1) Cosmic rays, then the Greisen�Zatsepin�Kuzmin limit. 2) idiot -- Uncle Al http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals) http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz4.htm |