Prev: False exponentials
Next: 10 Days
From: Steve C on 24 Mar 2010 16:26 William Elliot wrote: > Is pointless topology the study of some empty space? 1) The empty space is a region of the empty plane. 2) The empty plane must set on the ground, since a plane in the air has a pilot. 3) A grounded set is partially ordered. 4) A partially ordered plane is incomplete; it must be missing some parts. 5) It's pointless to have a plane which is missing some parts. Hence: pointless topology results in a pointless response.
From: Odysseus on 24 Mar 2010 22:25 In article <hodbso$g2e$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>, Norbert_Paul <norbertpauls_spambin(a)yahoo.com> wrote: <snip> > > Definition(absurd result) > A result is called /absurd/ iff ...(please continue) it's irrational? it's vocalized? -- Odysseus
From: William Elliot on 25 Mar 2010 00:34 On Wed, 24 Mar 2010, Steve C wrote: > William Elliot wrote: >> Is pointless topology the study of some empty space? > > 1) The empty space is a region of the empty plane. > 2) The empty plane must set on the ground, since a plane in the air has a > pilot. Drone on about pilotless planes. > 3) A grounded set is partially ordered. > 4) A partially ordered plane is incomplete; it must be missing some parts. > 5) It's pointless to have a plane which is missing some parts. > > Hence: pointless topology results in a pointless response. >
From: William Elliot on 25 Mar 2010 00:35 On Wed, 24 Mar 2010, nigel wrote: > Norbert_Paul wrote: > >> William Elliot wrote: >> >>> Is pointless topology the study of some empty space? >> >> No. >> It is the study of /the/ empty space. > > Is /dev/null part of the empty space? > dev/null is a function of empty space.
From: William Elliot on 25 Mar 2010 02:38
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010, Norbert_Paul wrote: > William Elliot wrote: >> On Wed, 24 Mar 2010, Norbert_Paul wrote: >> >>> William Elliot wrote: >>>> Is pointless topology the study of some empty space? >>> No. >>> It is the study of /the/ empty space. >> >> Oh, some unique empty space. > The empty topological space is the pair ({},{{}}). > Naw, it's ({ x | x /= x }, {{ x | x /= x }}) No, it's (0,{0}) = { {0}, {0,{0}} } = { {0}, 1 } = { 001 }. >> However, according to the theory of pointless topology >> only sober spaces are pointless. Such is the absurd >> results of abstract nonsense, technically know as >> category theory. > What is a sober space? A is irreducible when A is a hyper-connected subspace. S is sober when S is T0, for all irreducible K, some x with K = cl {x}. Hausdorff spaces are sober. The cofinite topology is intoxicated. A space can be pointless iff it's sober. Sober is the category of pointless spaces. Pointless spaces are categorically pointless. > What is an absurd result? Pointless topology bequeathed upon us by abstract nonsense, category theory is a pointlessly absurd result. Does the category of absurd results include category theory? The category of absurd results, is an absurdly large number of objects with a morphism from every object to every other object though some morphisms are more amorphous than others. > Definition(absurd result) I've described the category of absurd results. > A result is called /absurd/ iff ...(please continue) > Others have answered those questions without the absurdity of category theory. |