From: Paul Witlon on
On Mon, 15 Mar 2010 09:47:25 -0800, Robert Baer
<robertbaer(a)localnet.com> wrote:


>> So I can then derive 50O Ohms in series or parallel.
>>
>> Secondary voltage doesn't matter.
>>
>> Paul Witlon
> That is a hell of a lot of turns of small wire - which most likely
>would not fit on the presumed "small" toroid.

Sorry, that was a typo. Should have been _50_ Ohms.

Anyway the 7 mAH from RS looks about right if I parallel the windings.

http://docs-asia.origin.electrocomponents.com/webdocs/0028/0900766b800286a9.pdf

Many thanks,

Paul Winton.

From: pimpom on
Paul Witlon wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Mar 2010 09:47:25 -0800, Robert Baer
> <robertbaer(a)localnet.com> wrote:
>
>
>>> So I can then derive 50O Ohms in series or parallel.
>>>
>>> Secondary voltage doesn't matter.
>>>
>>> Paul Witlon
>> That is a hell of a lot of turns of small wire - which most
>> likely
>> would not fit on the presumed "small" toroid.
>
> Sorry, that was a typo. Should have been _50_ Ohms.
>
> Anyway the 7 mAH from RS looks about right if I parallel the
> windings.
>
> http://docs-asia.origin.electrocomponents.com/webdocs/0028/0900766b800286a9.pdf

7 mAH? That doesn't make sense as a spec for a transformer. If
you tell us what you're trying to do, we'd be in a much better
position to help.

Unless you're quite experienced in electronics and are sure of
what you're doing, you could be using a completely wrong approach
to achieve what you want.


From: Phil Allison on

"Paul Witlon"
>
> Anyway the 7 mAH from RS looks about right if I parallel the windings.

** Crikey: it is a 7VA unit - pal.


> http://docs-asia.origin.electrocomponents.com/webdocs/0028/0900766b800286a9.pdf
>


** You have seriously misread the data.

That tranny has a single primary winding with a tapping at the mid point.

So it CANNOT be paralleled or there will be a massive short.

There is no way to get close to 50 ohms either.

What planet are you on ??????



..... Phil


From: Grant on
On Mon, 15 Mar 2010 07:11:30 GMT, paulwitlon(a)laritron.com (Paul Witlon) wrote:

>On Mon, 15 Mar 2010 09:47:25 -0800, Robert Baer
><robertbaer(a)localnet.com> wrote:
>
>
>>> So I can then derive 50O Ohms in series or parallel.
>>>
>>> Secondary voltage doesn't matter.
>>>
>>> Paul Witlon
>> That is a hell of a lot of turns of small wire - which most likely
>>would not fit on the presumed "small" toroid.
>
>Sorry, that was a typo. Should have been _50_ Ohms.
>
>Anyway the 7 mAH from RS looks about right if I parallel the windings.

A tiny battery might be rated at 7mAH, but not a transformer, another typo?
>
>http://docs-asia.origin.electrocomponents.com/webdocs/0028/0900766b800286a9.pdf
>
>Many thanks,
>
>Paul Winton.