From: Brian Tillman [MVP-Outlook] on
"Tom Brown" <Burner2_DELETE_NOSPAM(a)att.net> wrote in message
news:%23tRJI7P1KHA.364(a)TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...

> I think of WLM as a hybrid between Outlook and OE. I just object to the
> thin, lightweight look of WLM.

I, too, find the readability of WLM to be lacking. I wonder whose idea it was
to make the message list so low contrast.
--
Brian Tillman [MVP-Outlook]

From: Tom Brown on
I have noticed that is generally the look of Vista and Win 7 and not just
WLM. I do hope they had a really good reason for doing it instead of fixing
something that wasn't broken. I still prefer Office 97 and Office 2003 to
either of the two "improvements" in 2007 and 2010. But then I also liked
WP5 so what do I know?

Tom


"Brian Tillman [MVP-Outlook]" <tillman1952(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:OkPcZkZ1KHA.3648(a)TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> "Tom Brown" <Burner2_DELETE_NOSPAM(a)att.net> wrote in message
> news:%23tRJI7P1KHA.364(a)TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>
>> I think of WLM as a hybrid between Outlook and OE. I just object to the
>> thin, lightweight look of WLM.
>
> I, too, find the readability of WLM to be lacking. I wonder whose idea it
> was to make the message list so low contrast.
> --
> Brian Tillman [MVP-Outlook]
>