Prev: mysterious 15-minute delay at boot in Ultra 20 running Solaris 10 X86
Next: mysterious 15-minute delay at boot in Ultra 20 running Solaris10 X86
From: Paul Branon on 8 Aug 2010 13:35 Hi Guys, http://www.wuppdich.com/combined_error.txt (I'm providing a separate link to my df -h and zfs list output because there is too much of it to put in an email.) I suspect I'm missing some zfs mountpoints from within my localzone. The localzone loopback mounts globalzone's filesystem. Both are supposed to mount rpool/opt upon / and rpool/output01 upon /output01 respectively. The global zone appears to be doing this just fine. But the local zone can't do it and appears to be mounting its /opt and /output01 filesystems on / I'm currently working through through the issues and would appreciate inciteful comments. Regards, PaulB
From: Ian Collins on 8 Aug 2010 15:51 On 08/ 9/10 05:35 AM, Paul Branon wrote: > Hi Guys, > > I suspect I'm missing some zfs mountpoints from within my localzone. > The localzone loopback > mounts globalzone's filesystem. Both are supposed to mount rpool/opt > upon / > and rpool/output01 upon /output01 respectively. > > > The global zone appears to be doing this just fine. But the local zone > can't do it > and appears to be mounting its /opt and /output01 filesystems on / > > I'm currently working through through the issues and would appreciate > inciteful comments. Post the zone's config. -- Ian Collins
From: Paul Branon on 8 Aug 2010 15:54 On Aug 8, 8:51 pm, Ian Collins <ian-n...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > On 08/ 9/10 05:35 AM, Paul Branon wrote: > > > Hi Guys, > > > I suspect I'm missing some zfs mountpoints from within my localzone. > > The localzone loopback > > mounts globalzone's filesystem. Both are supposed to mount rpool/opt > > upon / > > and rpool/output01 upon /output01 respectively. > > > The global zone appears to be doing this just fine. But the local zone > > can't do it > > and appears to be mounting its /opt and /output01 filesystems on / > > > I'm currently working through through the issues and would appreciate > > inciteful comments. > > Post the zone's config. > > -- > Ian Collins Hi Ian, The info you need is all here: http://www.wuppdich.com/combined_error.txt
From: Ian Collins on 8 Aug 2010 16:14 On 08/ 9/10 07:54 AM, Paul Branon wrote: > On Aug 8, 8:51 pm, Ian Collins<ian-n...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> On 08/ 9/10 05:35 AM, Paul Branon wrote: >> >>> Hi Guys, >> >>> I suspect I'm missing some zfs mountpoints from within my localzone. >>> The localzone loopback >>> mounts globalzone's filesystem. Both are supposed to mount rpool/opt >>> upon / >>> and rpool/output01 upon /output01 respectively. >> >>> The global zone appears to be doing this just fine. But the local zone >>> can't do it >>> and appears to be mounting its /opt and /output01 filesystems on / >> >>> I'm currently working through through the issues and would appreciate >>> inciteful comments. >> >> Post the zone's config. > > Hi Ian, > > The info you need is all here: > http://www.wuppdich.com/combined_error.txt You would have been better off posting it here. Anyway, I don't see your problem. You have one dataset assigned to the zone, which has to exist otherwise the zone install would have failed. add dataset set name=rpool/zonedata/localzone01 end You will not be able to see any other ZFS filesystems created in the global zone. If you want to see them as regular filesystems, loop-back mount them. You have one filesystem loop-back mounted: add fs set dir=/output01 set special=/output01/zone set type=lofs set options=[rw] end That appears to be OK as well. -- Ian Collins
From: Paul Branon on 8 Aug 2010 17:08
Hi Ian, Yes, it's a really difficult problem to spot. But, put simply, both the global zone and the local zone have various partitions which act as mountpoints for the zfs filesystems and they are (a) rpool/home mounted on /home rpool/opt mounted on /opt rpool/output1 mounted on /output01 etc, etc,etc you see them all if you look at the output here: http://www.wuppdich.com/combined_error.txt (b) But, the local zone is behaving badly and not mounting its /opt or / output01 filesystems properly. (And I think I know why. I think it's because it has not been configured to mount rpool/opt on /opt or rpool/output01 on /output01 (ie the guy who wrote the scripts forgot that bit, and has been doing that bit by hand, I guess.) But the scripts were passed to me and I'd never run them before and someone said "hey. those new local zones don't mount /opt or / output01 as separate partitions they just write that data straight to / (which since on the globalzone is zonepath /zoneroot/localzone01/root/ will amount to /zoneroot/localzone01/root/output01 and /zoneroot/localzone01/root/opt respectively. And what he said was, hey! That data shouldn't be there. It should be somewhere else, (though he didn't say where else it should be.) But, looking at all of the other localzone01 mountpoints would suggest that the data should have been written to rpool/zonedata/serverdb01/opt rpool/zonedata/serverdb/output01 respectively, (following the convention of where the other rpool/zonedata filesystem data is being written to. But when I think this through it occurs to me that rpool/ data in the localzone is all mounted loopback from the global zone from /zoneroot/localzone01 So it makes me wonder if any data was actually written in the wrong place at all, or if in reality all the guy can legitimately complain about is that the filesystems are being mounted in the wrong place in the local zone. And the mountpoints need to be fixed. I'm not 100% sure which of us is right, me or him. Cheers, Paulb |