Prev: American Golfinch eating Purple Thistle seeds
Next: Alternative monitor for iMac-recommendation?
From: LOL! on 14 Jun 2010 21:09 On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 00:50:26 GMT, "Dud-ley Hanks" <debeggar(a)suck_them_blind.ca> wrote: >I could do even more >with L-series lenses and better lighting equipment. Yes, you can suck your donors dry of their money and make it yours, while making just as blurry, badly exposed, and randomly kiltered compositions as you could with a Barbie Cam, only now using L-Glass that wouldn't make your crapshots the least bit better. You're a black-hole of WASTE. You're not just a spam-artist, you're a SCAM artist! LOL!
From: Dudley Hanks on 14 Jun 2010 21:15 "LOL!" <lol(a)lol.org> wrote in message news:2ekd165dckbqn5srk8o1nclf1t9j7gcegu(a)4ax.com... > On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 00:50:26 GMT, "Dud-ley Hanks" > <debeggar(a)suck_them_blind.ca> wrote: > >>I could do even more >>with L-series lenses and better lighting equipment. > > Yes, you can suck your donors dry of their money and make it yours, while > making just as blurry, badly exposed, and randomly kiltered compositions > as > you could with a Barbie Cam, only now using L-Glass that wouldn't make > your > crapshots the least bit better. > > You're a black-hole of WASTE. > > You're not just a spam-artist, you're a SCAM artist! > > LOL! > Others disagree... Even your criticism of my work is based on year-old compositions.. Your oh-so critical eye can't find much wrong with my current TEST shots ... It's interesting that Da Vinci also had patrons... Was he a black hole of waste too? Take Care, Dudley
From: LOL! on 14 Jun 2010 21:24 On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 01:15:32 GMT, "Dudley Hanks" <dhanks(a)blind-apertures.ca> wrote: > >"LOL!" <lol(a)lol.org> wrote in message >news:2ekd165dckbqn5srk8o1nclf1t9j7gcegu(a)4ax.com... >> On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 00:50:26 GMT, "Dud-ley Hanks" >> <debeggar(a)suck_them_blind.ca> wrote: >> >>>I could do even more >>>with L-series lenses and better lighting equipment. >> >> Yes, you can suck your donors dry of their money and make it yours, while >> making just as blurry, badly exposed, and randomly kiltered compositions >> as >> you could with a Barbie Cam, only now using L-Glass that wouldn't make >> your >> crapshots the least bit better. >> >> You're a black-hole of WASTE. >> >> You're not just a spam-artist, you're a SCAM artist! >> >> LOL! >> > >Others disagree... > >Even your criticism of my work is based on year-old compositions.. Your >oh-so critical eye can't find much wrong with my current TEST shots ... > >It's interesting that Da Vinci also had patrons... Was he a black hole of >waste too? > He had something that you'll NEVER have -- TALENT. More talent in a hair from his beard than you'll ever have in your whole loser of a life. But you go ahead, keep scamming and spamming. I'm sure you'll find idiots who are stupid enough to believe that some new camera you want to buy will eventually have a "talent button" on it somewhere. Failing that ... get out that tin cup and sit in a gutter. Then people can spit on you in real life for being such a pathetic loser, instead of spitting on you verbally on the internet for the very same reason. LOL!
From: Dudley Hanks on 14 Jun 2010 21:32 "LOL!" <lol(a)lol.org> wrote in message news:38ld169calbjgnefjh39tc9kcb5u46t80d(a)4ax.com... > On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 01:15:32 GMT, "Dudley Hanks" > <dhanks(a)blind-apertures.ca> wrote: > >> >>"LOL!" <lol(a)lol.org> wrote in message >>news:2ekd165dckbqn5srk8o1nclf1t9j7gcegu(a)4ax.com... >>> On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 00:50:26 GMT, "Dud-ley Hanks" >>> <debeggar(a)suck_them_blind.ca> wrote: >>> >>>>I could do even more >>>>with L-series lenses and better lighting equipment. >>> >>> Yes, you can suck your donors dry of their money and make it yours, >>> while >>> making just as blurry, badly exposed, and randomly kiltered compositions >>> as >>> you could with a Barbie Cam, only now using L-Glass that wouldn't make >>> your >>> crapshots the least bit better. >>> >>> You're a black-hole of WASTE. >>> >>> You're not just a spam-artist, you're a SCAM artist! >>> >>> LOL! >>> >> >>Others disagree... >> >>Even your criticism of my work is based on year-old compositions.. Your >>oh-so critical eye can't find much wrong with my current TEST shots ... >> >>It's interesting that Da Vinci also had patrons... Was he a black hole of >>waste too? >> > > He had something that you'll NEVER have -- TALENT. More talent in a hair > from his beard than you'll ever have in your whole loser of a life. > > But you go ahead, keep scamming and spamming. I'm sure you'll find idiots > who are stupid enough to believe that some new camera you want to buy will > eventually have a "talent button" on it somewhere. > > Failing that ... get out that tin cup and sit in a gutter. Then people can > spit on you in real life for being such a pathetic loser, instead of > spitting on you verbally on the internet for the very same reason. > > > LOL! > > But, you still can't find fault with my current work... So, there must be some talent there... As I've said in the past, it takes a blind photographer ten times the skill for a blind photographer to achieve one-tenth the results of a sighted photographers efforts. Not everybody is as calloused as you are, LOL... There are those who fund innovation and vision... Take Care, Dudley
From: LOL! on 14 Jun 2010 21:43 On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 01:32:07 GMT, "Dudley Hanks" <dhanks(a)blind-apertures.ca> wrote: > >But, you still can't find fault with my current work... Just as I said, mentally blind too. You don't even remember (or want to remember) being told how shitty they are. Thanks for proving again that you're not only physically blind, you're mentally blind. Seek non-photography-related help, you sorely need it. LOL!
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 Prev: American Golfinch eating Purple Thistle seeds Next: Alternative monitor for iMac-recommendation? |