From: Andrei Popescu on
Hello Debian Users,

A regression introduced in kernel 2.6.30, where the beeps produced by
the BIOS on power chord removal are disabled[1] was recently fixed for
2.6.33 which AFAIK will *not* be in Squeeze.

I'm trying to get this issue fixed for Squeeze, but, since I'm aware
that the Debian kernel team doesn't have a lot of time, it would be very
nice to be able to just provide a bug report with the patch to apply.

Since my laptop is one of the affected models I tried to test the patch
provided for 2.6.33[2], following the "rebuild official kernel"
how-to[3], but the patch doesn't seem to apply:

- if I follow the guideline and just drop it under
debian/patches/bugfixes/all and add the relevant 5+beep.1 series file
the patch seems to be ignored (no mention in the output of
'make -f debian/rules source-all')
- if I try to apply it manually it failes:

amp(a)think:linux-2.6-2.6.32$ patch -p0 < debian/patches/bugfix/all/thinkpad-beep.patch
patching file b/sound/pci/hda/patch_analog.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 71.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 165.
Hunk #3 FAILED at 203.
Hunk #4 FAILED at 3482.
Hunk #5 FAILED at 3523.
Hunk #6 FAILED at 3655.
6 out of 6 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file b/sound/pci/hda/patch_analog.c.rej

Unless I'm doing something terribly wrong, at this point I'm assuming
that the patch will not apply to 2.6.32, but I have no ideea how
difficult it would be to backport it. Comments?

This issue is not a showstopper for me as I can just use the 2.6.29
kernel or wait for a fixed 2.6.33 in experimental (and unstable after
the release), but it seems worthwhile to have it fixed for squeeze.

[1] https://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=4BAE0730.8020509%40gmail.com&forum_name=alsa-user
[2] https://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_name=alpine.LNX.2.00.1003261047210.3925%40eeebox2.perex-int.cz
[3] http://wiki.debian.org/HowToRebuildAnOfficialDebianKernelPackage

Regards,
Andrei
--
http://nuvreauspam.ro/2010/05/4-neticheta-pe-mail/
From: deloptes on
Andrei Popescu wrote:

>
> Unless I'm doing something terribly wrong, at this point I'm assuming
> that the patch will not apply to 2.6.32, but I have no ideea how
> difficult it would be to backport it. Comments?
>

if you are not supporting multiple systems that need this patch you can
download and compile the kernel from kernel.org

The kernel patches are applied to the main line in this case to 2.6.33 by
the way (if you are using the patch from kernel.org.

regards


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST(a)lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster(a)lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/hsdvta$fbo$1(a)dough.gmane.org
From: Andrei Popescu on
On Wed,12.May.10, 12:28:57, deloptes wrote:
> Andrei Popescu wrote:
> >
> > Unless I'm doing something terribly wrong, at this point I'm assuming
> > that the patch will not apply to 2.6.32, but I have no ideea how
> > difficult it would be to backport it. Comments?
>
> if you are not supporting multiple systems that need this patch you can
> download and compile the kernel from kernel.org

I'm not (very) interested in a quick fix, since I have several
workarounds already. I just want to get this fixed for Squeeze, which
will be around for 2 years.

Regards,
Andrei
--
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic
From: deloptes on
Andrei Popescu wrote:

> On Wed,12.May.10, 12:28:57, deloptes wrote:
>> Andrei Popescu wrote:
>> >
>> > Unless I'm doing something terribly wrong, at this point I'm assuming
>> > that the patch will not apply to 2.6.32, but I have no ideea how
>> > difficult it would be to backport it. Comments?
>>
>> if you are not supporting multiple systems that need this patch you can
>> download and compile the kernel from kernel.org
>
> I'm not (very) interested in a quick fix, since I have several
> workarounds already. I just want to get this fixed for Squeeze, which
> will be around for 2 years.
>
> Regards,
> Andrei

I don't understand. you are compiling the kernel anyway. why not compile the
latest stable?

regards


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST(a)lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster(a)lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/hsgg6d$npg$2(a)dough.gmane.org
From: Alexey Salmin on
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 4:19 PM, deloptes <deloptes(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> Andrei Popescu wrote:
>
>> On Wed,12.May.10, 12:28:57, deloptes wrote:
>>> Andrei Popescu wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Unless I'm doing something terribly wrong, at this point I'm assuming
>>> > that the patch will not apply to 2.6.32, but I have no ideea how
>>> > difficult it would be to backport it. Comments?
>>>
>>> if you are not supporting multiple systems that need this patch you can
>>> download and compile the kernel from kernel.org
>>
>> I'm not (very) interested in a quick fix, since I have several
>> workarounds already. I just want to get this fixed for Squeeze, which
>> will be around for 2 years.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Andrei
>
> I don't understand. you are compiling the kernel anyway. why not compile the
> latest stable?
>
> regards
>

You're missing the point completely. Andrei don't won't to compile the
kernel, he wants to get this patch with the standard squeeze kernel.

Andrei, you probably should write to debian-kernel mailing list or
fill a bug against linux-image-2.6 package in Debian BTS (then
debian-kernel will get a CC AFAIK). If you'll get no response there
try to raise the discussion at debian-devel (quite an active mailing
list).

Alexey


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST(a)lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster(a)lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTimUNZIN7g1B4KdvNUy6wx2Ee_JTrcdGpAbn6rQZ(a)mail.gmail.com