From: David L. Jones on
For those with a Rigol DS1052E oscilloscope, you can now turn it into a
100MHz DS1102E with just a serial cable:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LnhXfVYWYXE

Dave.

--
================================================
Check out my Electronics Engineering Video Blog & Podcast:
http://www.eevblog.com


From: Trevor Wilson on
David L. Jones wrote:
> For those with a Rigol DS1052E oscilloscope, you can now turn it into
> a 100MHz DS1102E with just a serial cable:
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LnhXfVYWYXE
>
> Dave.

**You're a bad man, Dave. A very bad man.

Nice one. Thanks.


--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au


From: John Larkin on
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 11:29:12 +1100, "David L. Jones"
<altzone(a)gmail.com> wrote:

>For those with a Rigol DS1052E oscilloscope, you can now turn it into a
>100MHz DS1102E with just a serial cable:
>
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LnhXfVYWYXE
>
>Dave.

What you have done is possibly a criminal act in the USA, using a
computer to deprive Rigol of revenue. In the US, "using a computer" to
perform an act can be a much more severe crime than the act itself.

I have some sympathy for Rigol here. Many of our products have an
option that can be enabled in firmware, and that we charge for. We put
a lot of engineering effort into the firmware, and need to be paid for
it. If buyers of my gear can order the cheaper one and make it into
the expensive one, by copying an EPROM maybe, or setting a bit in
flash somewhere, I can't recover the cost of the feature. The act is
arguably legal theft. It's certainly moral theft.

Products are increasingly IP and less hardware these days, and the IP
is expensive.

Of course, Rigol made it too easy. They will probably go back and make
it harder to do, and that will make the scope cost more in both
versions.

I recently got a 1052E, and it's a pretty nice scope. The digital
filtering is not perfect, but it's sure cute. It has way more goodies
than a comparable Tek for under half the price. I'll probably get a
few more.

John

From: F Murtz on
David L. Jones wrote:
> For those with a Rigol DS1052E oscilloscope, you can now turn it into a
> 100MHz DS1102E with just a serial cable:
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LnhXfVYWYXE
>
> Dave.
>
This url does not open on my seamonkey but does on IE6 (with a warning
to update browser)(which I did not do)
From: miso on
On Mar 30, 8:03 pm, John Larkin
<jjlar...(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 11:29:12 +1100, "David L. Jones"
>
> <altz...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >For those with a Rigol DS1052E oscilloscope, you can now turn it into a
> >100MHz DS1102E with just a serial cable:
>
> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LnhXfVYWYXE
>
> >Dave.
>
> What you have done is possibly a criminal act in the USA, using a
> computer to deprive Rigol of revenue. In the US, "using a computer" to
> perform an act can be a much more severe crime than the act itself.
>
> I have some sympathy for Rigol here. Many of our products have an
> option that can be enabled in firmware, and that we charge for. We put
> a lot of engineering effort into the firmware, and need to be paid for
> it. If buyers of my gear can order the cheaper one and make it into
> the expensive one, by copying an EPROM maybe, or setting a bit in
> flash somewhere, I can't recover the cost of the feature. The act is
> arguably legal theft. It's certainly moral theft.
>
> Products are increasingly IP and less hardware these days, and the IP
> is expensive.
>
> Of course, Rigol made it too easy. They will probably go back and make
> it harder to do, and that will make the scope cost more in both
> versions.
>
> I recently got a 1052E, and it's a pretty nice scope. The digital
> filtering is not perfect, but it's sure cute. It has way more goodies
> than a comparable Tek for under half the price. I'll probably get a
> few more.
>
> John

The design cost is amortized over all the units. [Hey, don't worry
what the consults charges, it will go to zero as we sell a million
units.]

Rigol does themselves a disservice by having to maintain two
products. They should just sell the higher speed scope, bomb the
market, and then own it.