From: spammer on 24 May 2010 01:37 If we make a videos of both twins one rocket away (with some speed of light) into space and the other stayed on earth and then how would the movies (motion) of both twins be best explained if played side by side after? One camera is on board the rocket and the other is on earth.
From: whoever on 24 May 2010 08:43 "spammer" <zarmewa(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:454f7651-f00f-4bc3-9223-89f3e5db44a7(a)32g2000prq.googlegroups.com... > If we make a videos of both twins one rocket away (with some speed of > light) into space and the other stayed on earth and then how would the > movies (motion) of both twins be best explained if played side by side > after? One camera is on board the rocket and the other is on earth. They wouldn't be that interesting. One would be a short video of a twin getting a little older (by an amount equal to the length of the video), and the other a longer vide of the other twin getting much older (again, by an amount equal to the length of the video) . One video would finish before the other. Pretty simple really. --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news(a)netfront.net ---
From: dlzc on 24 May 2010 10:08 Dear spammer: On May 23, 10:37 pm, spammer <zarm...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > If we make a videos of both twins one rocket > away (with some speed of light) into space > and the other stayed on earth and then how > would the movies (motion) of both twins be > best explained if played side by side after? > One camera is on board the rocket and the > other is on earth. "whoever" has it right. All the physics in the two frames makes internal sense. The two videos will be aged (have a duration) just like the twins. Clocks, nine minute eggs, heart beats, even a bromate clock, all seems correct for the frame they are embedded in. David A. Smith
From: mpc755 on 24 May 2010 10:32 On May 24, 1:37 am, spammer <zarm...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > If we make a videos of both twins one rocket away (with some speed of > light) into space and the other stayed on earth and then how would the > movies (motion) of both twins be best explained if played side by side > after? One camera is on board the rocket and the other is on earth. Don't believe the nonsense in the responses so far. The rate at which a clock ticks has nothing to do with time. A space ship is circling the Earth at a high rate of speed as the Earth orbits the Sun. An astronaut on the space ship determines where the space ship and the Earth are relative to the Sun bases upon the distant stars. The Earth makes one complete orbit of the Sun as determined by the astronaut on the space ship. How much time has passed for the astronaut on the space ship? One year, duh! It doesn't matter how many times the clock on the space ship has 'ticked'. One year is one orbit of the Sun by the Earth, period. If the clock doesn't say one year has passed then the clock did not 'tick' at the correct rate.
From: Androcles on 24 May 2010 10:43 "dlzc" <dlzc1(a)cox.net> wrote in message news:32187c67-e8cf-40fe-af81-9b2c9ea91d43(a)g1g2000pro.googlegroups.com... Dear spammer: On May 23, 10:37 pm, spammer <zarm...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > If we make a videos of both twins one rocket > away (with some speed of light) into space > and the other stayed on earth and then how > would the movies (motion) of both twins be > best explained if played side by side after? > One camera is on board the rocket and the > other is on earth. "whoever" has it right. All the physics in the two frames makes internal sense. The two videos will be aged (have a duration) just like the twins. Clocks, nine minute eggs, heart beats, even a bromate clock, all seems correct for the frame they are embedded in. David A. Smith ============================================= One camera is on board the rocket for three years watching the Earth and the other camera is on Earth for four years watching the rocket. The cameras are web cams. Rocket twin meets Earth twin a year before Earth twin meets rocket twin, they are not simultaneous events. "Whoever" is insane if he has that right. Oh wait... you already are, Smiffy.
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 Prev: Sci.physics.research (:-)!!! Next: Particle Mass/Stability Spectrum Retrodicted at 99.6% |