From: spammer on
If we make a videos of both twins one rocket away (with some speed of
light) into space and the other stayed on earth and then how would the
movies (motion) of both twins be best explained if played side by side
after? One camera is on board the rocket and the other is on earth.
From: whoever on
"spammer" <zarmewa(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:454f7651-f00f-4bc3-9223-89f3e5db44a7(a)32g2000prq.googlegroups.com...
> If we make a videos of both twins one rocket away (with some speed of
> light) into space and the other stayed on earth and then how would the
> movies (motion) of both twins be best explained if played side by side
> after? One camera is on board the rocket and the other is on earth.

They wouldn't be that interesting. One would be a short video of a twin
getting a little older (by an amount equal to the length of the video), and
the other a longer vide of the other twin getting much older (again, by an
amount equal to the length of the video) . One video would finish before
the other. Pretty simple really.



--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news(a)netfront.net ---
From: dlzc on
Dear spammer:

On May 23, 10:37 pm, spammer <zarm...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> If we make a videos of both twins one rocket
> away (with some speed of light) into space
> and the other stayed on earth and then how
> would the movies (motion) of both twins be
> best explained if played side by side after?
> One camera is on board the rocket and the
> other is on earth.

"whoever" has it right. All the physics in the two frames makes
internal sense. The two videos will be aged (have a duration) just
like the twins.

Clocks, nine minute eggs, heart beats, even a bromate clock, all seems
correct for the frame they are embedded in.

David A. Smith
From: mpc755 on
On May 24, 1:37 am, spammer <zarm...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> If we make a videos of both twins one rocket away (with some speed of
> light) into space and the other stayed on earth and then how would the
> movies (motion) of both twins be best explained if played side by side
> after? One camera is on board the rocket and the other is on earth.

Don't believe the nonsense in the responses so far. The rate at which
a clock ticks has nothing to do with time. A space ship is circling
the Earth at a high rate of speed as the Earth orbits the Sun. An
astronaut on the space ship determines where the space ship and the
Earth are relative to the Sun bases upon the distant stars. The Earth
makes one complete orbit of the Sun as determined by the astronaut on
the space ship. How much time has passed for the astronaut on the
space ship? One year, duh! It doesn't matter how many times the clock
on the space ship has 'ticked'. One year is one orbit of the Sun by
the Earth, period. If the clock doesn't say one year has passed then
the clock did not 'tick' at the correct rate.
From: Androcles on

"dlzc" <dlzc1(a)cox.net> wrote in message
news:32187c67-e8cf-40fe-af81-9b2c9ea91d43(a)g1g2000pro.googlegroups.com...
Dear spammer:

On May 23, 10:37 pm, spammer <zarm...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> If we make a videos of both twins one rocket
> away (with some speed of light) into space
> and the other stayed on earth and then how
> would the movies (motion) of both twins be
> best explained if played side by side after?
> One camera is on board the rocket and the
> other is on earth.

"whoever" has it right. All the physics in the two frames makes
internal sense. The two videos will be aged (have a duration) just
like the twins.

Clocks, nine minute eggs, heart beats, even a bromate clock, all seems
correct for the frame they are embedded in.

David A. Smith
=============================================
One camera is on board the rocket for three years watching the Earth
and the other camera is on Earth for four years watching the rocket.
The cameras are web cams.
Rocket twin meets Earth twin a year before Earth twin meets rocket
twin, they are not simultaneous events. "Whoever" is insane if he has
that right.
Oh wait... you already are, Smiffy.