Prev: WARNING about Sanny (the Untouchable)
Next: problem understanding the Liénard-Wiechert demonstration by O'Rahilly
From: Dr Math on 15 Feb 2010 13:38
Buh?

-"JSH" <jstevh(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ffe92171-20ce-456d-b669-8e6636ca5998(a)u5g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
-Remarkably random may have been in plain sight with prime numbers for
-some time, where a simple probability calculation shows the problem
-with academic mathematicians interpretations *against* random which
-is why I never post to sci.math - it's about math there, and I
-am not about math, but impotent blithering consisting of
-several lines of "text"

Buh?

-First off I've noted an area of prime behavior where prime numbers
-have no reason to have a reason. And that is governed by what I call
-the prime imbecile residue of nothingness in my vacuous skull.

Buh?



 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: WARNING about Sanny (the Untouchable)
Next: problem understanding the Liénard-Wiechert demonstration by O'Rahilly