From: Tom Lane on
Josh Berkus <josh(a)agliodbs.com> writes:
> Can someone verify that these two C interface issues are intentional?
> If not, they're bugs:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-testers/2010-05/msg00011.php
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-testers/2010-05/msg00010.php

That's ecpg, not "C interface" --- the latter term is unlikely to
draw the attention of the right person, namely Michael.

regards, tom lane

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

From: Michael Meskes on
On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 02:14:12PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> That's ecpg, not "C interface" --- the latter term is unlikely to
> draw the attention of the right person, namely Michael.

Right, thanks Tom. I have an email filter that filters all emails containing
"ecpg" anf puts them into a special directory so they get attention.

I will follow up with the reporters.

Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
ICQ 179140304, AIM/Yahoo/Skype michaelmeskes, Jabber meskes(a)jabber.org
VfL Borussia! Força Barça! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers