From: Noel Jones on 16 Mar 2010 10:17 On 3/16/2010 7:41 AM, Oleksii Krykun wrote: > 2010/3/16 Noel Jones<njones(a)megan.vbhcs.org>: >>>> Make the virtual aliases explicit. >>>> >>>> ----8<---- >>>> user1(a)domain2 user1(a)domain1 >>>> user2(a)domain2 user2(a)domain1 >>>> user3(a)domain1 user3(a)domain2 >>>> user4(a)domain1 user4(a)domain2 >>>> ---->8---- >> >> Yes, this is the correct solution. > > In future both domain users will migrate to one of them. > I think to use explicit aliasing in one direction and global aliasing > in another. > Is it bad? Don't use wildcard or global rewrites in virtual_alias_maps or canonical_maps. They defeat recipient validation, which will clog your queue with undeliverable messages and will get you blacklisted as a backscatter source. -- Noel Jones
From: Ansgar Wiechers on 16 Mar 2010 11:21 On 2010-03-16 Oleksii Krykun wrote: > 2010/3/16 Ansgar Wiechers <lists(a)planetcobalt.net> >> On 2010-03-16 Oleksii Krykun wrote: >>> I set up two domain aliases: >>> @domain1 @domain2 >>> and >>> @domain2 @domain1 >> >> This makes you a backscatterer, because Postfix will accept all mail >> for both domain1 and domain2 and create bounces if both local >> delivery and forwarding to the other domain fails. > > I don't see any difference between one or two domains here. I didn't say there were any. It's bad either way. Don't do it. Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- "Abstractions save us time working, but they don't save us time learning." --Joel Spolsky
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 Prev: Can't create maps via the proxy service Next: Configuring a separate transport for NDRs |