Prev: Allah calls one home...
Next: Gate resistor
From: Jim Thompson on 11 Apr 2010 20:49 On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 19:41:55 -0500, "eeboy" <jason(a)n_o_s_p_a_m.n_o_s_p_a_m.jasonorsborn.com> wrote: >> >>Do the remote devices transmit whenever they wish, or only on request >>from your microcontroller? >> > >Fortunately these two are only on request which is why I have chosen to >multiplex these two. > >--------------------------------------- >Posted through http://www.Electronics-Related.com Aren't we talking CMOS logic levels? Why not some kind of bus transceiver that can tri-state the undesired channel? ...Jim Thompson -- | James E.Thompson, CTO | mens | | Analog Innovations, Inc. | et | | Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus | | Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | | | Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat | | E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 | The only thing bipartisan in this country is hypocrisy
From: Paul Keinanen on 12 Apr 2010 00:32 On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 17:35:40 -0500, "eeboy" <jason(a)n_o_s_p_a_m.n_o_s_p_a_m.jasonorsborn.com> wrote: > >One thing I may not have been clear on. The communications from the UART >peripheral of the micro is simply logic level asynchronous serial >consisting of an RX and TX signal. No handshaking, no RS-232 voltage >levels. In that case a 3.3 V single open collector chip with four 2 input OR gates that are 5 V tolerant should be sufficient. If the UART can be configured to use opposite polarity, an open collector-NAND chip would also suffice.
From: Jan Panteltje on 12 Apr 2010 06:47
On a sunny day (Sun, 11 Apr 2010 17:35:40 -0500) it happened "eeboy" <jason(a)n_o_s_p_a_m.n_o_s_p_a_m.jasonorsborn.com> wrote in <GO2dnY_PN4Eh01_WnZ2dnUVZ_t2dnZ2d(a)giganews.com>: >One thing I may not have been clear on. The communications from the UARTperipheral of the micro is simply logic level >asynchronous serialconsisting of an RX and TX signal. No handshaking, no RS-232 voltagelevels. One or more 74HC4053 |