UNIX datagram sockets
in [Perl]
|
From: Uri Guttman on 23 Jun 2010 14:38 >>>>> "JK" == John Kelly <jak(a)isp2dial.com> writes: JK> On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 14:15:14 -0400, "Uri Guttman" <uri(a)StemSystems.com> JK> wrote: JK> Once upon a time, Usenet users were friendly and generous. Maybe those JK> days are gone now, but I remember when ... >> >> and you are helping how with your comments? i just asked a question >> which took you 3 replies to answer, why did you post this. instead you >> flamed me until you actually answered it. i never attacked you, JK> Yes you did, you said my recipe was not interesting, implying my post JK> was worthless to anyone who might read it. it wasn't interesting to me as it had NO CONTEXT. just code with no reason for posting. if you said, i had issues with writing this and here is why i did this, it might have been interesting. but you just posted some simple socket code with no explanation of why it might be interesting. uri -- Uri Guttman ------ uri(a)stemsystems.com -------- http://www.sysarch.com -- ----- Perl Code Review , Architecture, Development, Training, Support ------ --------- Gourmet Hot Cocoa Mix ---- http://bestfriendscocoa.com ---------
From: Uri Guttman on 23 Jun 2010 14:39 >>>>> "R" == Ruud <rvtol+usenet(a)xs4all.nl> writes: R> John Kelly wrote: >> Please ignore bad practices in this code R> And that made me stop reading. Next! another reason it wasn't interesting to me. uri -- Uri Guttman ------ uri(a)stemsystems.com -------- http://www.sysarch.com -- ----- Perl Code Review , Architecture, Development, Training, Support ------ --------- Gourmet Hot Cocoa Mix ---- http://bestfriendscocoa.com ---------
From: John Kelly on 23 Jun 2010 14:44 On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 14:38:50 -0400, "Uri Guttman" <uri(a)StemSystems.com> wrote: > >> flamed me until you actually answered it. i never attacked you, > > JK> Yes you did, you said my recipe was not interesting, implying my post > JK> was worthless to anyone who might read it. > >it wasn't interesting to me as it had NO CONTEXT Then you could have just ignored it. But you decided to pick a fight instead. Happy now? -- Web mail, POP3, and SMTP http://www.beewyz.com/freeaccounts.php
From: Uri Guttman on 23 Jun 2010 14:56 >>>>> "JK" == John Kelly <jak(a)isp2dial.com> writes: JK> On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 14:38:50 -0400, "Uri Guttman" <uri(a)StemSystems.com> JK> wrote: >> >> flamed me until you actually answered it. i never attacked you, >> JK> Yes you did, you said my recipe was not interesting, implying my post JK> was worthless to anyone who might read it. >> >> it wasn't interesting to me as it had NO CONTEXT JK> Then you could have just ignored it. But you decided to pick a fight JK> instead. Happy now? me thinks you picked the fight. i just asked a question. you are the prickly skinned one here. i still haven't attacked you and you are attacking me. look in the mirror if you can. show me one line where i said anything about you. i just wanted to know why you posted it. but you don't seem to get that yet. over and out. uri -- Uri Guttman ------ uri(a)stemsystems.com -------- http://www.sysarch.com -- ----- Perl Code Review , Architecture, Development, Training, Support ------ --------- Gourmet Hot Cocoa Mix ---- http://bestfriendscocoa.com ---------
From: John Kelly on 23 Jun 2010 15:09
On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 14:56:07 -0400, "Uri Guttman" <uri(a)StemSystems.com> wrote: >me thinks you picked the fight. i just asked a question. you are the >prickly skinned one here. i still haven't attacked you and you are >attacking me. look in the mirror if you can. show me one line where i >said anything about you. i just wanted to know why you posted it. but >you don't seem to get that yet. over and out. I explained why I posted it, but you didn't like that explanation, and you continued arguing. If you want to act like a troll, then so be it. -- Web mail, POP3, and SMTP http://www.beewyz.com/freeaccounts.php |