From: Jolly Roger on 30 Jan 2010 11:08 In article <fmoore-56C0D4.11034929012010(a)mail.eternal-september.org>, Fred Moore <fmoore(a)gcfn.org> wrote: > In article <timmcn-A93D65.18192028012010(a)news-1.mpls.iphouse.net>, > Tim McNamara <timmcn(a)bitstream.net> wrote: > > > In article <fmoore-1E67F3.13381428012010(a)mail.eternal-september.org>, > > Fred Moore <fmoore(a)gcfn.org> wrote: > > > > > IPad? That�s So 2002, Fujitsu Says > > > <http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/29/technology/companies/29name.html> > > > > Since the name doesn't sizzle- unlike, apparently, the product itself > > which looks way nifty- and has problems, great excuse to get out of it > > and call it something else. > > Yeh, I find iPad underwhelming for various reasons. Tom Stiller in a > different thread in this forum suggested 'Slice'. After I thought about > it for a minute, I REALLY like that. 'Give me a Slice of Apple!' Meh. I think time will tell the name isn't what really matters. -- Send responses to the relevant news group rather than email to me. E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my very hungry SPAM filter. Due to Google's refusal to prevent spammers from posting messages through their servers, I often ignore posts from Google Groups. Use a real news client if you want me to see your posts. JR
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 Prev: iPad is supercool Next: So, it's basically a king sized iPod touch...? |